How Can I Overcome Impedance Issues for Accurate Inrush Current Measurements?

AI Thread Summary
To accurately measure inrush current within the first 50 microseconds of activating a relay with a Chroma 61605 AC source, impedance issues must be addressed, as the device's switching nature limits its ability to regulate current effectively at such short intervals. Inrush current typically lasts between 8.3 to 167 milliseconds, but the peak may occur and dissipate much faster in specific applications. Suggestions include adding a 10 µF film capacitor and a 0.1 µF mica capacitor to the output to help manage the current spike, ensuring that the capacitors are rated for AC use to avoid failure. Additionally, it’s important to differentiate between transient voltage and transient current by checking the oscilloscope readings. Proper calculations regarding voltage drop across the capacitors during current draw are also recommended for accurate measurements.
lennybogzy
Messages
94
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to measure inrush current by looking at the voltage of a 0.1ohm resistor in the line within the first 50uS of flipping a relay to a variable AC source.

Problem is that the new AC source that I have (chroma 61605) apparently has an impedance issue which prohibits good inrush measurements. (E.g. 120VAC @ 60HZ is way different from it than from the wall when it comes to <50uS "turn on" measurements of inrush current).

Any way to overcome this?
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
The Chroma is a switching type controller, it is unlikely that it can control or regulate current at time periods as short as <50uS.
Isn't inrush current generally meant to be 1/2 to maybe 10 cycles (8.3 to 167 millisecond)?
Correct me if the preceding is incorrect. This is not my area of expertise.
 
Carl Pugh said:
The Chroma is a switching type controller, it is unlikely that it can control or regulate current at time periods as short as <50uS.
Isn't inrush current generally meant to be 1/2 to maybe 10 cycles (8.3 to 167 millisecond)?
Correct me if the preceding is incorrect. This is not my area of expertise.

Maybe it depends on the device? in my case the peak current value occurs and dissipates within the first 50uS of switching my relay.
 
You could try putting two capacitors on the output of the Chroma.
Say maybe a 10 uf film capacitor and maybe a 0.1 uf mica capacitors. You should probably do some calculations on how much the voltage on the 10 uf capacitor will drop with the current that is drawn.
Use capacitors that are rated for AC operation. Capacitors that are rated for DC operation will fail.

Could you be picking up some sort of transient voltage and not transient current?
With oscilloscope probe ground connected, short oscilloscope probe input to ground. If the transient is still there, you are seeing transient voltage.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top