How Can I Remove Reaction Time When Calculating the Speed of Sound?

AI Thread Summary
To accurately calculate the speed of sound, the experiment involved timing the interval between seeing two wooden blocks hit and hearing the sound produced. To eliminate reaction time errors, suggestions included having a second person clap when they see the blocks hit while the experimenter looks away. This method aims to ensure that the timing is not influenced by the experimenter's reaction delays. Estimating reaction time is also discussed, with a caution that significant errors could lead to unrealistic temperature readings. Overall, the focus is on refining the timing method to enhance accuracy in measuring the speed of sound.
stevenback7
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Today i did a simple expirement to calculate the speed of sound by placing someone 180 m away from me and telling the clap two wooden blocks. I timed the time it took between me seeing the blocks hit each other and when i heard the sound of the two blocks. Now in order for this to be as acurate as possible i want to remove the time it took me to react. So does anyone know anyway i can remove the time it takes me to react from the expirement ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just estimate your reaction time and remove it from the time you got
 
The reaction time should cancel because you take x seconds to start the watch after you see the blocks then x seconds when you hear the clap.
 
yes kurdt it should cancel out but since I'm dealing with a time less then a second but if i looked at the blocks i would be more likely to start the stopwatch before the blocks hit and would be less likely to stop it on time. So in order to get over that problem i got someone to stand beside me and count to 3 while i looked at the ground and timed as accurately as possible.

i will try to estimate it ponjavic but if it goes above like 0.2 of a second then it would mean my results would show that the outside temp. was like 50 degress celcius.
 
You could get someone to stand next to you and clap when they see the wooden blocks hit, with you looking away. Then, you can measure the time between the 2 claps.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top