How Can I Simplify Trigonometric Expressions Using Euler's Formula?

AI Thread Summary
To simplify trigonometric expressions using Euler's formula, start by expressing the cosine and sine functions in terms of exponential functions. For the expression z=cos(ωt - π/3) - cos(ωt), rewrite it as z=Re(e^{i(ωt - π/3)} - e^{iωt}). This allows for simplification through algebraic manipulation of the exponential terms. Similarly, for z=sin(ωt) - 2cos(ωt - π/4) + cos(ωt), apply the same principles using the relationships e^{iθ} = cos(θ) + i sin(θ) and Re(z) = (z + z*)/2. Utilizing these methods can significantly streamline the process of simplifying trigonometric expressions.
mewmew
Messages
113
Reaction score
0
Express the following in the form z=Re[Ae^{i(\omega t+\alpha)}]

z=cos(\omega t - \frac{\pi}{3}) - cos (\omega t)
and
z=sin(\omega t) - 2cos(\omega t - \frac{\pi}{4}) + cos(\omega t)

I got a few of the problems correct by using trig. identities but it was pretty tough and two I can't get. Our teacher said you can use a tric to solve them easier but didn't have time to finish, I just know it has something to do with the polar form of e^{i \theta} I really have no clue on how to do these without using the really long method of trig. identities. Any help would be great. Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
z = \textrm{Re}(e^{i(\omega t - \pi/3} - e^{i\omega t})
=\textrm{Re}( e^{i\omega t}( e^{-i\pi/3}-1))
= \textrm{Re}(( e^{-i\pi/3}-1) \;\;e^{i\omega t})

Does that help?

Don't be ashamed, it's far better to be conversant in trig than to know a few tricks.

Carl
 
Along the lines of CarlB, but without jumping straight into using Re(),
recall e^{i\theta}=\cos\theta+i\sin\theta, from which you can derive
\cos\theta=\frac{1}{2}(e^{i\theta}+e^{-i\theta}) and a similar expression for \sin\theta (which I left for you to do).

So, now:
<br /> z&amp;=\frac{1}{2}(e^{i[\omega t-\pi/3]}+e^{-i[\omega t-\pi/3]})-\frac{1}{2}(e^{i[\omega t]}+e^{-i[\omega t]})
then do some algebra.

Recall that Re(z)=\frac{1}{2}(z+z^*). Thus Re(e^{i\theta})=\cos\theta.
 
Thanks a lot, that makes it much more simple.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top