How Can Integration by Parts Be Applied to Solve Advanced Calculus Problems?

timman_24
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Integrate the following by parts twice

\int_{a}^{b}\frac{d}{dr}(r\frac{dT(r)}{dr})\psi(r)dr

and show that it can be written as -\lambda^2\bar{T} , where

\bar{T}=\int_{a}^{b}r\psi(r)T(r)dr

and the function \psi satisfies the following equation

\frac{1}{r}\frac{d}{dr}(r\frac{d\psi(r)}{dr})+\lambda^2\psi(r)=0

Relevant equations and attempt

Of course the integration by parts equation, but I used the tabular method to get the first integration of:

\psi(r)r\frac{dT(r)}{dr}-\int_{a}^{b}\psi\prime(r)r\frac{dT(r)}{dr}dr

But as you can see in the next step it gets more complicated because the v choice now needs integration by parts as well and since the T(r) portion will end up being an integral without a definite solution, I don't know where to take it from there. I tried to get things to cancel but haven't found a way yet. Am I going about this the wrong way?

On the second integration by parts I tried to group \psi\prime(r)r together under u and it cleaned up v, but u became a mess without a way to cancel.

Any help would be greatly appreciated. I am a little rusty on this stuff and this was provided as a refresher problem to me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've given it my best shot and have tried just about every way possible. There must be some trick or technique that I haven't learned yet to deal with this. If anyone has any thoughts about how I might tackle it, it would be much appreciated.

Thanks
 
timman_24 said:
If anyone has any thoughts about how I might tackle it, it would be much appreciated.

Thanks

I got thoughts but it's not exactly as you put it. For starters, I assume you mean the following problem:

Let \psi(r) satisfy the following DE:

\frac{1}{r}\frac{d}{dr}(r\frac{d\psi(r)}{dr})+\lambda^2\psi(r)=0

then show:

\int_{a}^{b}\frac{d}{dr}(r\frac{dT(r)}{dr})\psi(r) dr=-\lambda^2\int_a^b r\psi T dr

But that's not what I get. You did parts once, how about do it again to obtain:

r\psi \frac{dT}{dr}-rT\psi'+\int T(r\psi''+\psi')

now, using the differential equation, this looks to me to be:

\int_{a}^{b}\frac{d}{dr}(r\frac{dT(r)}{dr})\psi(r) dr=\left(r\psi T'-rT\psi'\right)_a^b-\lambda^2\int_a^b r\psi T

and this is consistent with numerical calculations letting \psi(r)=\text{BesselJ}(0,\lambda r) and T(r)=r^2+2r
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top