How can logarithmic expressions be simplified effectively?

yungman
Messages
5,741
Reaction score
294
I want to verify this:

2ln(x)-ln(2x)=ln(x^2)-ln(2x)=ln\left(\frac{x^2}{2x}\right)=ln\left(\frac x 2\right)
ln(2x)-ln(x)=\ln\left(\frac {2x}{x}\right)=ln(2)

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They're pretty straight applications of the log laws

log_{c}(a^{b}) = blog_{c}(a)

log_{c}(a) - log_{c}(b) = log_{c}(\frac{a}{b})
 
yungman said:
I want to verify this:

2ln(x)-ln(2x)=ln(x^2)-ln(2x)=ln\left(\frac{x^2}{2x}\right)=ln\left(\frac x 2\right)
ln(2x)-ln(x)=\ln\left(\frac {2x}{x}\right)=ln(2)

Thanks
You can also do the first one as

##\displaystyle 2\ln(x)-\ln(2x)=2\ln(x)-(\ln(x)+\ln(2))=\ln(x)-\ln(2)=\ln(x/2)
##
 
SammyS said:
You can also do the first one as

##\displaystyle 2\ln(x)-\ln(2x)=2\ln(x)-(\ln(x)+\ln(2))=\ln(x)-\ln(2)=\ln(x/2)
##

Thanks, I am so rusty on these math as I don't use it often! I was stuck for a day in the other thread about sine and cosine integrals because of this. All of a sudden, I remember all the log things and it answer my question there.

Many thanks.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top