Programs How Can Physics and Neuroscience Intersect?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the intersection of neuroscience and physics, emphasizing the potential for physicists to engage in neuroscience research. It notes that many neuroscientists have backgrounds in physics, which can enhance their understanding of neural processes. Key figures in this interdisciplinary field include Terry Sejnowski, Tomaso Poggio, Xiao-Jing Wang, and Larry Abbott, who have made significant contributions to neuroscience from a physics perspective. Recommended resources for further exploration include "Theoretical Neuroscience" by Peter Dayan and Larry Abbott, and "Biophysics of Computation" by Christoph Koch, both of which delve into the theoretical and computational aspects of neuroscience. This area of study offers a compelling opportunity for those interested in the physics of neural functions.
Substance D
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
I was wondering if anyone out there knows someone who is involved in both fields? I'm curious if there is any areas of neuroscience that a physicist would be involved in, it sounds like it would be an interesting area of study.

Thanks :approve:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One second with Google yields

http://www.bu.edu/neuro/departments/dpt_mc.html

That ought to get you started.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Working medical physics you can do research in areas like this. For example: http://www.oakland.edu/physics/physics_people/emeriti_professors/Tepley.htm and http://henryfordhealth.org/body.cfm?id=37863
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There are lots of neuroscientists with primary training in physics.

Some top people are:

Terry Sejnowski (Salk institute) http://www.salk.edu/faculty/faculty/details.php?id=48

Tomaso Poggio (MIT)
http://cbcl.mit.edu/cbcl/people/poggio/poggio-cv-web.htm

Xiao-Jing Wang (Yale)
http://info.med.yale.edu/bbs/faculty/wan_xi.html

Larry Abbott (Columbia)
http://neurotheory.columbia.edu/larry.html

and many others.

If you are interested in this area I recommend taking a look at Peter Dayan and Larry Abbott's textbook "Theoretical Neuroscience", It seems to be the standard text. https://www.amazon.com/dp/0262541858/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Or the more advanced book by Cristoph Koch "Biophysics of Computation"
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0195181999/?tag=pfamazon01-20
 
Last edited by a moderator:
the physics of how neurons go through their functions would be a nice topic for you
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top