How Can We Generate Trig Tables with the 'Many Worlds' Approach?

  • Thread starter Thread starter phibonacci
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trig
AI Thread Summary
Generating a trigonometric table requires knowledge of Taylor expansions to achieve arbitrary precision through sufficient terms, alongside basic arithmetic skills. The angle addition formulas can also be utilized for calculations based on known triangles. A unique "many worlds" approach is proposed, where random digits are written down, with the premise that incorrect results would lead to the destruction of the universe, thus only correct results persist. This method is particularly useful for constants like Chaitlin's \Omega, which lack straightforward calculation methods. Ongoing research is noted, particularly regarding the theoretical implications of this approach.
phibonacci
What is the required knowledge to generate a trig table?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
A Taylor expansion of the function you want to look at will let you calculate it to arbitrary precision by taking enough terms. Then you just need to be able to add and multiply (and either a computer, or a lot of time!).
 
You can also calculate it by repeated application of the angle addition formulas, and a known triangle.
 
Last edited:
I prefer the nondetermanistic "many worlds" approach:
1. I write down random digits, hoping they're correct.
2. If they're wrong, the universe is destroyed.
We continue to exist only in those universes where I write the correct results.

This approach is especially effective for constants like Chaitlin's \Omega where there's no easy way to calculate it. Of course, I haven't actually managed to implement step 2 yet. Research continues (see the IEDAB's methods for destroying the Earth for the foremost research).
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top