How Can You Create Different Sound Waves Using Everyday Materials?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on creating a device that produces different sound waves using everyday materials, emphasizing the study of sound wave production and resonance. Participants suggest using items like spoons or rubber bands and recommend constructing a tube closed at one end to vary the wavelength for different frequencies. The importance of resonance is highlighted, with examples of how adding a wooden block can amplify sound by increasing amplitude. Additionally, the relationship between string tension, wavelength, and frequency is discussed, confirming that a shorter wavelength results in a higher frequency tone. The conversation also touches on experiments to explore sound speed variations in different mediums, such as water.
itmpls
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Purpose:

# to study the production of sound waves
# to build a device that will produce different sounds
# to play a tune of your device
# devise a way to make sound from the material
# be able to make different sounds with the material


Materials:
# any material you can find around your home


Procedure:

# device must be able to produce at least 5 different frequencies
# you can not use any conventional musical instrument in part or in whole
you must be able to play your device
# write a report, complete with diagrams, on how your device works
# include these terms in your report:

resonance tone amplitude
timbre frequency wavelength


Any ideas? Spoons? Rubber Bands?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's up to you how to figure out how to build the device, but I'd suggest some kind of tube closed at one end, where you can vary the length, l, in order to get a certain wavelength, \lambda
l = \frac{1}{4} \lambda
 
The instrument I made is similar to that of a violin but different because it’s in a rectangular shape. Without the block of wood, the string being plucked would make a weak sound. But when the block of wood is added, the sounds resonate and there’s more amplitude.
When I pluck at the string, the vibration creates compression waves in the air that result in sound, according to the frequency of the waves. The frequency can be changed slightly by adjusting the tension of the string (in this case you would have to wrap the line tighter around the nail).

The wavelength is twice the length of the string. The shorter the wavelength, the higher the frequency tone.






is this correct?
 
itmpls said:
The wavelength is twice the length of the string. The shorter the wavelength, the higher the frequency tone.
is this correct?
This is correct. In most cases you won't have to worry about the speed of sound being proportional to density of the medium, since you probably won't get enough variation in the frequency to hear the difference, even if you climb to a mountain.

A cool experiment my Physics teacher made on resonance was submerging a glass tube into a graduated cylinder filled with water, and holding a tuning fork over the tube. He could vary the lenth of the part of the tube not submerged into the water, in order to find the resonant wavelength with the specific frequency of the tuning fork. This way he could indirectly calculat the speed of sound.

Maybe it would be cool to get your diving goggles on and try this at the bottom of a pool, to see how the speed of sound varies by the density of the medium.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top