How Can You Minimize Spherical Aberration in a Single Lens System?

AI Thread Summary
To minimize spherical aberration in a single lens system with a focal length of 50 cm and a refractive index of 1.53, the discussion revolves around calculating the radii of curvature for the lens surfaces when an object is placed 70 cm away. The participant initially struggled with the equations related to refraction and the third-order theory but found it challenging to eliminate the variable for height (h) due to lack of information. They considered using a plano-convex lens design to reduce spherical aberration. Ultimately, the participant discovered the solution by applying the bending factor to determine the radii of curvature. The discussion highlights the importance of accurate note-taking and understanding the underlying equations in optical design.
fantagero88
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


- single lens
- f=50cm
- refractive index n=1.53
- if object placed 70cm, find the radii of curvature for the two surfaces of the lens which would minimise spehrical aberration

Homework Equations



what i got from my notes

refraction at a spherical surface

(n1/so+n2/si)=((n2-n1)/R)+h²[(n1/2so)(1/so+1/R)²+(n2/2si)(1/R-1/si)²]

this is after using the third order theory

The Attempt at a Solution



i tried to make another equation for the other side of the refractive surface and then added them together,
and also, tried to use r= infinity because i read that plano-convex can reduce SA.

but still i could get it on what kind of value that could show me when SA is minimised. and also, i couldn't get rid value for h, which the value is not given.

is minimising SA is to get the complete thins lens equation from the third order theory??

thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i found the answer..
damn, i lost one piece of my note.. no wonder i was lost.

so, what i did i just used bending factor to get the radii.
i'll try to post up the answer then i got back home
thanks
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top