How Can You Prove the Commutative Property of Vector Addition in Rn Spaces?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shenlong08
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Vectors
Shenlong08
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble with a proof : u+v=v+u
using the definition of a vector space (excluding the commutitive axiom of course), thus I have the other 9 axioms to work with.

I'm not even sure if I'm using one of the axioms right; since I cannot say that u+v=v+u, I don't think that I should say that u+(-u)=(-u)+u=0...which is what I've been trying to use.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
not sure what you are trying to do. Are you trying to prove the commutitive axiom from all the others?

Because if you are don't, it is an axiom for a reason, that is it cannot not be proven from the others, if it could it would not be an axiom, it would be a theorem and the commutitive axiom would not be in the definition.
 
let u={u1, u2...,un)
v={v1,v2...,vn)
then u+v= {u1+v1, u2+v2,...,un+vn} (vector addition)
or, u+v= {v1+v1, v2+u2,...,vn+un} (commutative property of addition on R)
therefore, u+v=v+u (vector addition)
 
Please, be careful about these, this is not a proof, this is exactly what mrandersdk has stated before. Note that, the two addition signs "+", (one for the addition u+v and one for the additions u_i+v_i that you used are different). We define the vector addition as such, it does not follow from the other axioms.

I can define the scalar addition as subtraction, then you don't have commutativity in that weird vector set (Since I destroyed the commutativity, it is not a vector space anymore, because commutativity is an axiom)
 
vdgreat said:
let u={u1, u2...,un)
v={v1,v2...,vn)
then u+v= {u1+v1, u2+v2,...,un+vn} (vector addition)
or, u+v= {v1+v1, v2+u2,...,vn+un} (commutative property of addition on R)
therefore, u+v=v+u (vector addition)
This is assuming that the vector space is Rn which was not given.
 
Back
Top