How Can You Tackle Environmental Chemistry Questions Effectively?

AI Thread Summary
To tackle environmental chemistry questions effectively, it's crucial to identify any assumptions that can be made when information is lacking. Utilizing relevant equations based on the context of the questions is essential for deriving answers. Clear presentation of questions, including legible formatting and outlining problem-solving steps, can significantly aid understanding. Engaging with peers for hints and guidance can also enhance problem-solving skills. Overall, a structured approach and collaboration are key to mastering environmental chemistry questions.
Priscilla
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Attachments: Questions and Answers

I try my very best to do the questions. But I really don't know how to get to the answer.
Could someone give me some hints of the questions: what assumption should I make if information is not given, and what equation can I use?
 

Attachments

  • Questions.doc
    Questions.doc
    32 KB · Views: 1,209
  • Answer1.jpg
    Answer1.jpg
    20.5 KB · Views: 391
  • Answer2.jpg
    Answer2.jpg
    17.3 KB · Views: 409
Physics news on Phys.org
The questions look to be complete (no assumptions necessary). The thumbnails are not legible --- rescan, type 'em, outline the steps you took --- something.
 
I resized them.
 

Attachments

  • Answer1.jpg
    Answer1.jpg
    14.9 KB · Views: 380
  • 1b.jpg
    1b.jpg
    24.7 KB · Views: 428
Second part
 

Attachments

  • Answer2.jpg
    Answer2.jpg
    18.2 KB · Views: 403
  • 1b.doc
    1b.doc
    270.5 KB · Views: 265
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top