How can you use a belt transect to record changes in species distribution?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monster92
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Belt Distribution
AI Thread Summary
A belt transect is an effective method for measuring species distribution and population density by using a rope stretched between two points, with designated areas on either side for counting organisms. This technique allows researchers to assess the density of larger organisms, such as trees and vegetation, and can be applied in both terrestrial and aquatic environments. To analyze changes in species distribution, it is important to consider both the spatial distribution from a specific point and temporal changes over time. The discussion highlights the need for clarity on measurement methods and factors affecting population density. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately recording and interpreting changes in species distribution.
Monster92
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
I need to study the measurement of population size of density. However, I can't find information on this that is understandable. Has anyone got any ideas?





The Attempt at a Solution


I already know they consist of a line with black marks to indicate something
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you need to know the different methods which you measure population density, or do you need help with the factors that affect population density?

I can probably help ya, just need to be a bit more specific. PM me if I don't respond back right away.
 
Here's what I've been given.

Measurement of Population size and Density

1. Methods used for measurement of populations

2. Use of abundance scales and their limitations

3. Use of belt transects to record changes in species distribution.

Number 3 is the task I'm stuck on. Sadly there was no extra information given. What's worse is that the official textbook seems to not address the task either.

THank you
 
Sorry, I didn't catch the title when I originally read this somehow. A belt transect is basically an extended version of a quadrant, which used to measure population density and distribution. Usually a rope is placed from point-A to point-B and a specific distance is set on each side (or some use two ropes) to account for the area. The organism(s) of interest can then be counted if they fall within the parameters and density can be calculated. Sometimes they also measure the distance of each organism from a point of interest as well. In this way they can analyze their distribution. Usually this technique is used to count larger organisms, a lot of the time for trees and vegetation. I'm sure it can be used in both terrestrial and aquatic applications though.

If the question is asking changes in species distribution.. I would also assume that they are either talking about the distribution from a particular point of interest, or change over time. I'm not quite sure. I don't think they would mark you off if you addressed both.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top