How could spring water lift a person?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of a young man being lifted by artificial spring water to a height of 4 meters, as depicted in a TV advertisement. Participants analyze the situation using physics principles, particularly the impulse-momentum theorem, to calculate the necessary velocity of the spring water. One contributor suggests that if the water source is at least 4 meters above the man, the lift is theoretically possible without complex calculations. Another participant calculates the velocity at ground level to be around 10 m/s, reinforcing the discussion on the practicality of the scenario. Overall, the conversation explores both the physics involved and the plausibility of such an event occurring as shown in the advertisement.
scalar
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
In an TV advertisement, a young man was lifted by an artificial spring water to a hight about 4 m. Supposed the man's weight is 800N, and the sectional area of the spring water is 0.2*0.2 m^2, and using the impuse-momentum theorem, I got a velocity of the spring water of 4m/s.
Is this correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
As long as the water table of the spring at its source was more than 4m above the ground where the man was standing, you're good to go, and you don't need all those fancy calculations.
 
scalar said:
In an TV advertisement, a young man was lifted by an artificial spring water to a hight about 4 m. Supposed the man's weight is 800N, and the sectional area of the spring water is 0.2*0.2 m^2, and using the impuse-momentum theorem, I got a velocity of the spring water of 4m/s.
Is this correct?
I don't quite understand what Dave is saying.

I get 4.5 m/sec at the height where the man is located. F = vdm/dt = v\rho dV/dt = v\rho Av = \rho Av^2. What is the velocity at the ground level?

AM
 
Andrew Mason said:
I don't quite understand what Dave is saying.
I was second-guessing him. I was assuming he wanted to figure out whether it was practically possible for a volume of water to lift a man 4 metres, (after all, that's what his thread title implies he's asking about), but that his method for doing so was with numbers (calcing the speed and momentum of the water) rather than deduction.

I was merely pointing out that, if the (inexhaustible) supply of the spring water was higher than ground (i.e. at least 4m higher) where the man is standing, then is is trivial to show that the water will shoot that high.
 
Last edited:
aha, just as dave said, I'm discussing the posibility of the advertisement. And the method I used is the same as Andrew's. The velocity of the spring water at the ground is about 10m/s. Thank you all.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top