How did they integrate the charge for Voltage question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on integrating to find the potential for a disc of charge, specifically addressing confusion about the integral involving R' and its disappearance in the calculation. It is clarified that the integral is not simply R'dR' due to the presence of the denominator, which includes √(z² + R'²). A u-substitution (u = z² + R'²) is suggested to aid in solving the integral. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the assumptions about the variables involved to simplify the problem. The conversation highlights the challenges of using software like Mathematica for such integrals without clear assumptions.
kiwibird4
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I have a question on finding potential for a disc of charge when it comes to the simple integration
upload_2016-2-2_0-18-39.png

how does the integral of R'dR'/etc have the R'dR' just disappear? i thought it would then be R^2/2
I am obviously missing something here
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi kiwibird4. Please remember to use the formatting template for all questions posted in the homework section.

The integral in question is not simply of R'dR'. Note that the denominator contains ##\sqrt{z^2 + R'^2}##.
 
kiwibird4 said:
I have a question on finding potential for a disc of charge when it comes to the simple integration
View attachment 95177
how does the integral of R'dR'/etc have the R'dR' just disappear? i thought it would then be R^2/2
I am obviously missing something here
u-substitution ##u = z^2+R'^2## is applied.
 
gneill said:
Hi kiwibird4. Please remember to use the formatting template for all questions posted in the homework section.

The integral in question is not simply of R'dR'. Note that the denominator contains ##\sqrt{z^2 + R'^2}##.

I'm SORRYYYY :cry::cry::cry::cry::cry::cry::cry::cry::H:H:H:H:H:H:H:H
I even had to check the lil button that said -I have followed the homework format
:cry:
 
kiwibird4 said:
I'm SORRYYYY :cry::cry::cry::cry::cry::cry::cry::cry::H:H:H:H:H:H:H:H
I even had to check the lil button that said -I have followed the homework format
:cry:
Somehow we must all struggle through this great tragedy and believe in the promise of a brighter tomorrow :smile:

Cheers.
 
Assuming you have looked up this integral in tables of same, I think what you're missing is the assumptions about the variables and z that would make the problem trivial if only you knew what they are. Even if you have success using the methods others have suggested earlier, looking for assumptions is a useful exercise that can pay off later on...

As an aside, it took me a while to get Mathematica to solve your integral. The evaluation hung up until I specified the assumptions required to give an unambiguous answer (The same one, even!). MMA's both interesting and frustrating that way. In order to be as general as possible, it makes few assumptions but provides the user with methods to specify them.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top