How Do Bar Magnets Create Zero Magnetic Field at Point P?

AI Thread Summary
A bar magnet can create a zero magnetic field at point P if another bar magnet is positioned such that their magnetic fields are equal in magnitude but opposite in direction. This occurs when the north pole of one magnet faces the south pole of another, resulting in a cancellation of the magnetic forces at a specific point between them. However, the effectiveness of this cancellation depends on the strength of the magnets involved; they must be sufficiently strong and appropriately aligned. The discussion emphasizes the importance of not assuming the magnets are identical unless specified, as differences in strength could affect the outcome. Overall, achieving a zero magnetic field at point P is feasible under the right conditions.
motleycat
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
1. The magnetic field at point P due to a magnetic source S1 is represented by ==>. Can a bar magnet S2 be brought close to P so that the total magnetic field at P due to S1 and S2 is zero? Explain your answer.2. None3. Yes, this is possible if both fields at point P have the same magnitude but a different direction. When two bar magnets are held vis-à-vis to each other (one’s north pole facing the other’s south pole) repulsion occurs between them. In the exact centre between those two poles of the two bar magnets a singular point exists where the magnetic field force equals 0.
Am I on the right track?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Probably. But this assumes that the second source is sufficiently strong to cancel out the first one with a field equal in magnitude and opposite in direction.
 
  • Like
Likes motleycat
Dr. Courtney said:
Probably. But this assumes that the second source is sufficiently strong to cancel out the first one with a field equal in magnitude and opposite in direction.

The second source is just another bar magnet, why would they differ?
 
motleycat said:
The second source is just another bar magnet, why would they differ?

Think like a scientist. If the statement of the question does not say they are identical, then why assume that they are?
 
  • Like
Likes motleycat
Dr. Courtney said:
Think like a scientist. If the statement of the question does not say they are identical, then why assume that they are?

I have just changed my answer. Does it look better now?

Thank you for your help!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top