How Do Charge Magnitudes and Signs Affect Electric Field Directions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter azila
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Direction
azila
Messages
67
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A negative point charge q1 = -4.00 nC is on the x-axis at x = 0.60 m. A second point charge q2 is on the x-axis at x=-1.20 m.

What must the sign and magnitude of q2 be for the net electric field at the origin to be 50.0 N/C in the +x direction be?

What must the sign and magnitude of q2 be for the net electric field at the origin to be 50.0 N/C in the -x direction be?


Homework Equations


Coulomb's Law
E = q1 + q2


The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, i got the part when it is in the + x direction but how would i do it for the - x direction? I was doing 50 = 100-q2, but i don't think it will work?? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for the sites, which I understand. But I know how to get the electric force in the +x direction but not in the -x direction. Could I do that to make it go in the -x direction, the charge of q1 could be +4.00 nC since electric field lines go away from positive charges? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
 
Since q1 have negative charge, it will attract a positive charge and repel a positive charge. Since q1 is to the right of q2 ( 0.6> -1.2) an attraction, toward q1, will be "in the positive direction" (from -1.2 toward +0.6) while a repulsion, away from q1, will be "in the negative direction" (from 0.6 toward -1.2).
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top