How Do Delta Functions Behave Under Scaling Transformations?

kq6up
Messages
366
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



Delta functions said to live under the integral signs, and two expressions (##D_1(x)## and ##D_2(x)##) involving delta functions are said to be equal if:

##\int _{ -\infty }^{ \infty }{ f(x)D_{ 1 }(x)dx } =\int _{ -\infty }^{ \infty }{ f(x)D_{ 2 }(x)dx }##

(a) Show that:

##\delta (cx)=\frac{ 1 }{ |c| } \delta (x)##

Where ##c## is a real constant. (Be sure to check the case where ##c## is negative.)

Homework Equations



Posted above.

The Attempt at a Solution



Let ##u=cx## ##\therefore## ##\frac{1}{c}du=dx##

This yields:

##\frac{1}{c}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{f(u/c)\delta (u)du}=\frac{1}{|c|}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{f(x)\delta (x)dx}##. This works for a test case where ##c > 0##, but obviously fails when ## c < 0##. I am not sure where this absolute value came from.

Hints please.

Thanks,
Chris
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't forget to think about the limits of integration when making a change of integration variable.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
TSny said:
Don't forget to think about the limits of integration when making a change of integration variable.

Isn't still negative infinity to infinity. Oh wait, not of the sign changes, so the sign flips. I think I got it now.

Thanks,
Chris
 
you can choose to try for f(x)=1
 
I used f(x)=x+2, and it works if I consider that using ##-c## would flip the signs of the infinities on the integral thus flipping the sign back to positive.

Chris
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top