How Do Electron Transitions Correspond to Energy Levels in Quantum Wells?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sss1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diagram
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on electron transitions between energy levels in quantum wells, specifically analyzing transitions from states n=4 to n=2, n=5 to n=4, n=5 to n=1, and n=4 to n=1. It establishes that these transitions correspond to specific states in different wells, such as well C and well D. The second problem involves calculating node separation, leading to the conclusion that n=10, with an energy difference formula derived from this state. There is a correction regarding the denominator in the energy calculation, which requires squaring, and a clarification on the correct measurement of 200 pm instead of 300 pm. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurate parameters in quantum well calculations.
sss1
Messages
50
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Can someone check whether I've done the problems in the pictures properly? not sure if i've done them correctly.
Relevant Equations
n^2h^2/8(m_e)a^2
Screen Shot 2023-10-09 at 22.18.32.png
Screen Shot 2023-10-09 at 22.19.23.png
Screen Shot 2023-10-09 at 22.19.28.png

For the problem with the diagram, I'm getting from n=4 to n=2, n=5 to n=4, n=5 to n=1 and n=4 to n=1. n=4 to n=2 corresponds to n=1 to n=2 in well C; n=5 to n=4 corresponds to n=1 to n=2 in well D; n=5 to n=1 corresponds to n=1 to n=3 in well D and n=4 to n=1 corresponds to n=1 to n=2 in well E.
For the second problem, since the node separation is given by L/n where n is the state, and given that there is no nodes between 60pm and 80pm, i worked out that n=10. So the difference in energy is (10^2-9^2)h^2/(8(m_e)(300pm))?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sss1 said:
For the problem with the diagram, I'm getting from n=4 to n=2, n=5 to n=4, n=5 to n=1 and n=4 to n=1. n=4 to n=2 corresponds to n=1 to n=2 in well C; n=5 to n=4 corresponds to n=1 to n=2 in well D; n=5 to n=1 corresponds to n=1 to n=3 in well D and n=4 to n=1 corresponds to n=1 to n=2 in well E.
For the second problem, since the node separation is given by L/n where n is the state, and given that there is no nodes between 60pm and 80pm, i worked out that n=10. So the difference in energy is (10^2-9^2)h^2/(8(m_e)(300pm))?
That appears correct, except the denominator in the energy at the end.
 
DrClaude said:
That appears correct, except the denominator in the energy at the end.
Needs squaring?
 
sss1 said:
Needs squaring?
Yes, and why 300 pm?
 
DrClaude said:
Yes, and why 300 pm?
Oh right, misread it. 200pm?
 
sss1 said:
Oh right, misread it. 200pm?
Yes
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
I was thinking using 2 purple mattress samples, and taping them together, I do want other ideas though, the main guidelines are; Must have a volume LESS than 1600 cubic centimeters, and CAN'T exceed 25 cm in ANY direction. Must be LESS than 1 kg. NO parachutes. NO glue or Tape can touch the egg. MUST be able to take egg out in less than 1 minute. Grade A large eggs will be used.
Back
Top