How do extremes of a variable affect an equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Omid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Variable
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding how extreme values of the variable t affect the acceleration equation a = [(at^2 - bt)/(t+c)d] + et^2/(t-c)d. When t equals 0, the value of a is determined to be 0. For t much larger than c (t >> c), the equation simplifies significantly, leading to a new expression for a. Conversely, when t is much smaller than c (t << c), the equation also simplifies, allowing for a different interpretation of a. The conversation emphasizes visualizing the effects of these extremes rather than relying solely on complex mathematical methods like the binomial theorem.
Omid
Messages
181
Reaction score
0
To get a feeling for how extremes of a variable affect an equation, suppose that the acceleration of a body is given by a = [(at^2 - bt)/(t+c)d] + et^2/(t-c)d where a,b,c,d,e are constants : (a) Determine the value of a when t=0. (b) Find the value of a when t>>c.
(c ) find the value of a when t<<c.

I tried approximation by binomial theorem but I got some meaningless equations (for me ) so I couldn't find such a feeling :biggrin:
Please help me with this problem.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rather than using an equation, just by looking at your acceleration equation try to see what happens when t >> c and t << c. If you can't visualize it, plug in actual numbers and see what happens.
 
I don't know why you would use the binomial theorem.

a= [(at^2 - bt)/(t+c)d] + et^2/(t-c)d
(Am I correct in assuming that the "a" on both sides is intended?)

Obviously, if t= 0, a= 0.

If t is "much larger than c" (t>> c) we can ignore the c added or subtracted (If you have $10000000, $1 more or less doesn't matter! On the other hand multiplying by a very small number can be important!) and write
a is very close to [(at^2 - bt)/(t)d] + et^2/(t)d = ((at-b)+et)/d= ((a+e)t-b)/d
so da= at+ et- b. (d-t)a= et-b so a= (et-b)/(d-t).

I'm going to interpret "t<< c" to mean "t is non-zero but much smaller than c but non-zero.

Now, we "ignore" the t in t-c and t+ c and have a= [(at^2 - bt)/cd] + et^2/(-c)d=
a(t^2/cd)- bt/cd+ (et^2/cd) so (1- t^2/cd)a= ((cd- t^2)/cd)a= (et^2- bt)/ce and
a= (et^2- bt)/(cd- t^2).
 
I should have written the "a" in the left hand side as capital, A. Because it is diffrent from the right hand side one.
Now, probably, I've found such a feeling.
Thanks
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top