A How Do Gamma Matrix Identities Relate to the Charge Conjugation Operator?

Bala Tala
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Consider the matrix ##C = \gamma^{0}\gamma^{2}##.

It is easy to prove the relations

$$C^{2}=1$$
$$C\gamma^{\mu}C = -(\gamma^{\mu})^{T}$$

in the chiral basis of the gamma matrices.1. Do the two identities hold in any arbitrary basis of the gamma matrices?

2. How is ##C## related to the charge conjugation operator?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Van Proeyen's Tools for Supersymmetry should be helpful :)
 
Bala Tala said:
Do the two identities hold in any arbitrary basis of the gamma matrices?

Aren't they obviously basis independent?

Bala Tala said:
How is ##C## related to the charge conjugation operator?

It is the charge conjugation operator.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top