How Do Gravity Waves Form from Space-Time Oscillations?

AI Thread Summary
Gravity waves are produced by oscillations in the fabric of space-time, which is curved by mass and energy. Cosmic events with high energy, such as colliding neutron stars, create ripples in space-time similar to ripples in water when a stone is thrown. These ripples are a result of changes in the gravitational field, which can occur during periodic motions or sudden collisions. The essential concept is that any change in the gravitational field generates a ripple effect, conveying information about the alteration in the field. Understanding this mechanism clarifies how significant cosmic events lead to gravitational wave production.
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
555
i have looked on the net but i can not find a site that
explains the MECHANICS of gravity wave production, as i understand
it is an oscillation in space time, if gravity is warped
space time how can the destruction of a massive body make it
oscilate, it implies some sort of bounce, but how can
space time bounce, or is the above total wrong?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Hi

I think that you have understood the concept the Gravitational Waves in a way that u shouldn't have. Imagine water ina bucket. This represents Space-Time without Mass in it. Now when you throw a stone, there are ripples produced or when a boat moves through water, there are ripple produced. Now it is said by GR that mass / energy curves the space-time fabric. So the presence of a mass-energy sorce curves space-time. Whenever there a cosmic event that involves really high levels of energy, then, there are ripples produced in the fabric. These ripples travel through the vastness of space and are called gravitational waves.


Sridhar
 
thankyou sridhar-n

i understand your analogy, the part I am not sure of is
what is actualy oscilating .
 
Originally posted by wolram
...how can the destruction of a massive body make [space-time curvature]
oscilate, it implies some sort of bounce, but how can
space time bounce...

astute question as yours so often are

would you accept that two neutron stars circling each other could produce a rippling? I think so. Something going around and around is similar to something bouncing up and down---periodic motion.

an electric charge going around and around produces a radio wave---the gravity wave equations are not too different from the "bending" in the electric&magnetic fields that propagates as wave

but suppose the two neutron stars don't circle each other at all but just approach each other along a straight line and simply smash into each other?----kerblam, it's over.

that is like a one-time spark jumping a gap----no bounce, at least no obvious bounce in any simple sense: you charge two things and bring them close, and a spark jumps, and that's it, over.

but even the jumping of a spark sends out a radio wavelet, a brief click pulse. any time a charge of electricity ACCELERATES it sheds energy even if only in the form of a brief pulse, you can even pick up the crackles as static on the radio sometimes

and maybe wolram if you looked very closely at the neutron stars colliding you would actually see a bounce---the momentum of the collision causing a brief over-compression, which produces a rebound and so on----like the vibrations resulting from a traincrash

Maybe the essential thing is believing in the reality of the gravitational field (pictured as a bunch of arrows in space or as a curvature or however)---the gravitational field associated with two stars-----with two centers of attraction----is a different shape from the field associated with one star only. So when two things crash the field must CHANGE SHAPE. Field equations, whether EM or grav, are such that any time a field changes shape it causes a ripple effect as the information spreads out into the world, the information that at some locale the field has changed---that is all waves are:

waves don't have to be periodic, they can be one-timers, but what they are above all is the information spreading out that the field has undergone some change in some locale

just an oversimplification but may help answer yr question
 
Last edited:
waves don't have to be periodic, they can be one-timers, but what they are above all is the information spreading out that the field has undergone some change in some locale
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yes now i am convinced, a major event can not occur without
some sort of reaction in the medium it exists in.
many thanks.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top