How do I calculate heat transfer through a wall with multiple layers?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate heat transfer through a multi-layer wall, the total heat transfer rate can be determined using the equation dQ/dt = (T1 - T2) / R, where R is the total thermal resistance of the wall layers. Each layer's resistance is calculated using R = L/(kA), with L being the thickness, k the thermal conductivity, and A the area. The intermediate temperatures between the layers can be found by assuming thermal equilibrium, where the heat transfer rates through each layer are equal. This approach allows for the calculation of the heat conducted through the wall without needing to find the exact temperatures at each interface. The discussion emphasizes the use of resistive networks to simplify the analysis of heat transfer in layered materials.
kris24tf
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Hello, I have a test coming up and this is a question that will be on it...

The wall of a house is composed of solid concrete with outside brick veneer and is faced on the inside with fiberboard. The fiberboard width is 2 cm, the concrete width is 15 cm, and the brick width is 7 cm. If the outside T is -10 degrees, and the inside T is 20 degrees, how much E is conducted through the wall with dimensions 3.5mx5m in 1 hour?

I want to try something along the lines of k1A(T-T1)/d1=k2A(T2-T1)/d2 or something along those lines, but I know I have to use a T3, but I'm not sure how to find the third T. If you or anyone could help me set that up, that would be great.

I know to use the equation delta Q/ delta t= kAT/d but I also know I have to find the temperature between the brick and fiberboard. I just don't knwo how to find it. I've tried everything, so any clear guidance would save my day...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I remember the the equation for a problem like this was something like..

power = [(area)(change in temp)]/[sumation of (length/conductivity)] , where the lengths are the thickness of each individual layer, and then the "conductivity" is the conductivity of that particular layer.

sorry, I'm kinda too tired to derive how they came about right now. I might do it later
 
Thanks, anytime before tomorrow at 11 would be great, but I appreciate that advice...

PS: I believe that answer is supposed to be 4.1 or something... I can't remember what,
 
Last edited:
This problem actually does not require you to find the temperature inbetween the conductive layers. We can make use of resistive networks. Also, we assume no convection effects at the surfaces.

\frac{dQ}{dt} = \frac{T_1 - T_2}{R}

where R represents the total resistance of the resistive network. We see here that because all the layers are in series (i.e. the heat must pass through all of them to get through to the other side), we can write:

R_t_o_t_a_l = R(concrete) + R(brick) + R(fiber)

If you recall, R = \frac{L}{kA}Now to also address your problem with finding the intermediate temperatures, you can do this through assuming equililbrium (dT/dt = 0) such that the heat through each suface is equal (or else there would be a temperature change and violate our assumed equilibrium).

You can write the equations of heat going through each and equivalate them, giving you enough equations to solve for the intermediate temperatures. For example:

\dot Q_1 = \frac{k_1A}{L}(T_1-T_2)
\dot Q_2 = \frac{k_2A}{L}(T_2-T_3)
\dot Q_3 = \frac{k_3A}{L}(T_3-T_4)

and so on, with

Q1 = Q2 = Q3 = ...
 
That last equation helped a lot! Thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top