How do I calculate the cell potential?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the cell potential for the given voltaic cell reaction, the Nernst equation is applied, requiring the determination of the reaction quotient (Q). The discussion highlights confusion regarding the use of hydrogen pressure and the impact of pH on the concentrations of hydrogen ions and iron species. It is suggested that the pH of 5.00 may be too high for the stability of Fe3+, and that it might be appropriate to ignore pH for the iron solution while using it for the hydrogen electrode. Participants confirm the need to balance the reaction equation correctly to proceed with calculating Q. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the conditions under which the reaction occurs to accurately determine cell potential.
Newton25
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
< Mentor Note -- thread moved to HH from the technical chemistryforum, so no HH Template is shown >[/color]

I was given this problem:
A voltaic sell uses the reaction 4Fe3+ + H2 --> 2Fe2+ +2H+.
Find the cell potential when [Fe3+]=1.50 M, PH2=.50 atm, and [Fe2+]=.00100 M and the pH of both anode and cathode compartments of the cell=5.00.
The reduction potentials are
Fe3+ +1e --> Fe2+ E=.771V
H2--> H+ + 2e E=0 V

I'm having quite a bit of difficulty with it. My first step was to balance the reaction equation and I split it into the half reactions. For the oxidation half, I got 2H2--> 4H+ + 4e. For the reduction, I got 4Fe3+ +4e --> 4Fe2+. And my E initial was .771 V. My next step was to use the Nernst equation. I had E=.771 - ((.0592)/4)logQ. Solving Q is the part that's giving me problems. First, I wasn't sure if I could use the pressure of H2 as everything else was a concentration. Second, the pH of both compartments being 5.00 is messing me up. If it was just the anodic compartment, I would use the antilog to determine the concentration of hydrogen ion. However, since it's 5.00 in both compartments, I have no clue what to do with that. If anybody could help with anything, it'd be greatly appreciated! Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Would it help if you ignore pH in the iron solution, and use it only for the hydrogen electrode? And yes, you should use pressure in Q, standard state calls for hydrogen pressure of 1 bar.

Actually question doesn't look good to me - if memory serves me well, solubility of Fe(OH)3 is so low Fe3+ can exist only in quite acidic solutions. pH 5 is way too high.
 
  • Like
Likes Newton25
Borek said:
Would it help if you ignore pH in the iron solution, and use it only for the hydrogen electrode? And yes, you should use pressure in Q, standard state calls for hydrogen pressure of 1 bar.

Actually question doesn't look good to me - if memory serves me well, solubility of Fe(OH)3 is so low Fe3+ can exist only in quite acidic solutions. pH 5 is way too high.
Yes, that would help. Thank you. I wasn't sure if I was able to ignore it or not.

So, would the Q then be equal to ([.00100]^4 * [antilog(-5.00)]^4)/ ([.50]^2 * [1.50]^4) ?
 
You are on the right track, but check if your reaction equation is balanced.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top