How do I calculate the cross section for a p p -> Z -> μμ process?

stefanos.leon
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi all.

This is my first time in the Physics Forums.

I would like to ask for guidance in a calculation of a cross section of a process. I know the Feynman graph but I'm completely lost on how to start the calculation..

For example..

p p -> Z -> μμ

Many thanks in advance..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you studied quantum field theory? Assuming you mean proton-proton in the initial state (and muon-antimuon in the final state), there are no tree-level diagrams for this process. The leading contribution is probably from gluon-gluon fusion and you'd need to know something about hadronic form factors to say anything meaningful with respect to proton-proton collisions.

I'm not trying to be too dismissive, but if you want to learn how to go from a Feynman diagram to an amplitude to a cross section, you should start with a simpler example and a QFT text. The posters here can be helpful at answering specific questions you might have that will come up along the way, but it's not very likely that a discussion forum is going to substitute for starting with the traditional learning sources.
 
In this case, a process like ##e^+ e^- \rightarrow Z^0 \rightarrow \mu^+ \mu^-## would definitely be easier to calculate. Unfortunately it's been a long time since I did anything like this (grad school 30+ years ago), so I can't help with details. When I retire in a few years it would make a nice project for me to re-learn this stuff.
 
Thanks for the replies!

Actually I'm an experimentalist and it's not that trivial and easy for me to do these calculations, although I had a QFT course..

I was hoping an analytical description of e.g. the chapter "Production cross-sections for W and Z in pp colliders" of Aitchison.. (22.5)

Many thanks again,
Stefanos
 
Unless there's a new edition of Aitchison and Hey, that section is about p\bar{p} collisions, which are very different from pp collisions. In the former case, you have the tree level q\bar{q}\rightarrow Z, which, together with the leptonic decay, forms a Drell-Yan type process.

I'd suggest reviewing e^+e^- \rightarrow \gamma \rightarrow e^+e^-, which is covered in just about any QFT text. Next, figure out what changes when you have \mu^+\mu^- in the final state. This is just kinematics, as it doesn't really change the form of the matrix element.

Next, use the electroweak Lagrangian to find the vertices and propagator to replace the photon with a Z, e^+e^- \rightarrow Z \rightarrow \mu^+\mu^-. This time the coupling constant at the vertices are different, as is the propagator, so the matrix element is a bit different.

Next, switch the electrons with quarks for q\bar{q} \rightarrow Z \rightarrow \mu^+\mu^-. The matrix element is similar, but evaluating the cross section would also involve summing over colors. I think Aitchison has some discussion of how to use form factors to relate this to p\bar{p}.

Now, as I said pp collisions are different, since most of the processes that lead to Z production involve at least one gluon and no antiquarks in the initial state. I think Barger and Phillips "Collider Physics" has a few sections on pp, but I'm not sure.
 
Many many thanks!
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top