How do I calculate the voltage of a diode in a simple electronics circuit?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the voltage across a diode in a simple electronics circuit. Participants explore the implications of the diode being in an OFF state, the conditions under which it can be considered conducting or non-conducting, and the resulting calculations for current and voltage in the circuit.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assume that since VA < VK, the diode is OFF and can be represented as a break in the circuit.
  • One participant calculates the current through the diode and concludes it is negative, suggesting the diode is OFF.
  • Another participant disagrees with the calculation of current direction, arguing that a negative current indicates the opposite direction to the assumed positive direction.
  • There is a suggestion that if the diode is conducting, the current would be calculated differently, leading to a conclusion that the diode must be faulty if reverse current is observed.
  • Some participants agree that if the diode is OFF, the voltage across it (VD) would be less than zero.
  • One participant proposes that the voltage across the diode can be found by considering the voltage source and the voltage drop across the resistor, noting that with no current flow, the voltage drop across the resistor is zero.
  • There are differing interpretations of how to define VD, with one participant suggesting it could be -8V based on their calculations.
  • Another participant mentions that the potential difference (PD) across the circuit could be +8V, depending on how VD is defined.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express both agreement and disagreement regarding the calculations and assumptions about the diode's state. There is no consensus on the exact voltage across the diode or the implications of the current direction, indicating multiple competing views remain.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the absence of a diagram showing VA, VK, and VD, which may limit the clarity of the discussion. The discussion also highlights the complexity of defining voltage across the diode depending on the assumed current direction and circuit configuration.

akaliuseheal
Messages
53
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


It's simple problem but I get stuck while calculating the VD.
202156-1d0b671766aff49cdd4501ee2cddd31c.jpg

Currents and voltages in the circuit are required.
So V, VD and I

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Since VA<VK I would assume that diode is OFF and then the diode can be represented by break.
Upon testing that the diode is ON, I get iD=(-5-3)/20k < 0 thus proving that it's OFF.
⇒I=iD = 0, VD < 0
Now, the problem for me is always finding the voltage of a diode since there is that break in the circuit.
English is not my native language so I hope I chose the right title of the topic and that I posted this in right thread.
 

Attachments

  • 1.PNG
    1.PNG
    5.4 KB · Views: 528
Physics news on Phys.org
I have some difficulty here because VA, VK and VD are not shown in the question (diagram), but let's try.
akaliuseheal said:
Since VA<VK I would assume that diode is OFF and then the diode can be represented by break.
Upon testing that the diode is ON, I get iD=(-5-3)/20k < 0 thus proving that it's OFF.
I don't agree with your calculation, because you seem to be calculating the current in the opposite sense (direction) to the arrow. But that simply gives the wrong direction for the current. If current is <0 that simply means it is in the opposite direction to what you chose as the positive direction of current.

If you assume the diode is conducting, you get a current of (3 - -5)/20k = .4mA in the direction of the arrow.
That would mean the diode was conducting in the reverse direction. So either it is faulty or has a very high reverse leakage!
Or you could conclude that a reverse current is impossible in an ideal diode, so the assumption that it is conducting, must be wrong. In which case I must be 0 as you go on to say.
⇒I=iD = 0, VD < 0
Assuming VD means the voltage across the diode in the direction of the arrow, Then the top is at +3V, the bottom is at -5V and the voltage across it is the difference. (I don't get it to be <0V)
Now, the problem for me is always finding the voltage of a diode since there is that break in the circuit.
Would you have a problem with any other circuit that did not have a diode in it - just the resistor and voltage sources? If the diode is off, just leave the break in the circuit and forget that it ever was a diode. ALL circuits contain breaks which cause no problems.
English is not my native language so I hope I chose the right title of the topic and that I posted this in right thread.
You did better than many English speakers! And certainly better than I could do in Russian or any of 100's of other languages!)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: donpacino
akaliuseheal said:

Homework Statement


It's simple problem but I get stuck while calculating the VD.
202156-1d0b671766aff49cdd4501ee2cddd31c.jpg

Currents and voltages in the circuit are required.
So V, VD and I

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Since VA<VK I would assume that diode is OFF and then the diode can be represented by break.
Upon testing that the diode is ON, I get iD=(-5-3)/20k < 0 thus proving that it's OFF.
⇒I=iD = 0, VD < 0
Now, the problem for me is always finding the voltage of a diode since there is that break in the circuit.
English is not my native language so I hope I chose the right title of the topic and that I posted this in right thread.
I agree with you that the diode is off. now you need to find the voltage of the diode.

Well Vd will just be the voltage across it, so your voltage source (3v) - V (the voltage node in the middle).

You can find V by taking the -5V and the voltage drop across R1.

Hint (This is very easy): Like you said there is a break since the diode is off. Since there is a break, no current can flow through the resistor. so the voltage drop across the resistor is zero.
 
Merlin3189 said:
I have some difficulty here because VA, VK and VD are not shown in the question (diagram), but let's try.

I don't agree with your calculation, because you seem to be calculating the current in the opposite sense (direction) to the arrow. But that simply gives the wrong direction for the current. If current is <0 that simply means it is in the opposite direction to what you chose as the positive direction of current.
202157-e1ea31c363bd6a8fbadbaefbc746bed9.jpg

Merlin3189 said:
Would you have a problem with any other circuit that did not have a diode in it - just the resistor and voltage sources? If the diode is off, just leave the break in the circuit and forget that it ever was a diode. ALL circuits contain breaks which cause no problems.
Usually not, but in electronics, I do sometimes get stuck.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    15.9 KB · Views: 503
akaliuseheal said:
202157-e1ea31c363bd6a8fbadbaefbc746bed9.jpg


Usually not, but in electronics, I do sometimes get stuck.
id would have to be zero because it is a broken circuit. no current can flow through a broken circuit!
 
donpacino said:
I get it to be 8V, but isn't the condition for diode to be off iD=0, VD<0 (ideally)
)
 
donpacino said:
id would have to be zero because it is a broken circuit. no current can flow through a broken circuit!

Yes, that is the calculation that I used to check is it ON (iD > 0 ?)
He wrote " I don't agree with your calculation "
 
it depends on how you define vd. In your case I guess it would have to be -8V
 
donpacino said:
it depends on how you define vd. In your case I guess it would have to be -8V
That was what was bothering me, that condition VD< 0.

Thanks to you two for looking into this.
 
  • #10
I suppose I was being a bit pernickity. The I arrow shows the current flowing from +5V to -3V, so I think the PD is +5 -(-3) = +8V
But as I said, VD wasn't specified. You could mark it on the circuit with its own arrow in the opposite direction.The remark about other circuits having breaks which cause no problem, was perhaps an obscure reference to the fact that all circuits have places where you could draw another wire, but you don't. And the wires that are not part of the circuit have no effect on it. If the diode is not there, then the circuit is just that much simpler.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
16K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
15K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
16K