How Do I Derive the Specific Thermal Diffusion Equation?

bon
Messages
547
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Please see question attached..


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Not sure how to go about the derivation..

I know the general derivation of the thermal diffusion equation where we imagine a surface S bounding a volume V, then integral of J.dS = d/dt integral over volume of CT dV

So using divergence theorem, the thermal diffusion equation pops out..

But how do i derive the equation here?

the heat flux isn't really across a surface..im a bit confused :S

Thanks!
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
*bump*
 
You can derive that equation from the heat equation. Just cancel out terms in the equation that don't apply. He/she tells you to assume the plates are copper rods, so that's why the laplacian is only in the x direction. In the heat equation there is an accumulation term, a convection term, a conduction term, and a removal or generation term. I don't think you need the convection term here unless you want to add in a fan or something. See my attachment.
 

Attachments

Sorry I still don't understand how to derive the first part of the question.. Any help would be greatt
 
where does the 2/a come from?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top