How do I differentiate a three-term product using the product rule?

McKendrigo
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Using the product rule, differentiate the following function:


Homework Equations


y = etsintcost


The Attempt at a Solution


The three term product rule says:

d/dx (uvw) = u'vw + uv'w + uvw'

I find u = et, u' = et, v = sint, v' = cost, w = cost and w' = -sint

Thus, dy/dx = etsintcost + etcos2t - etsin2t

= et(sintcost + cos2t -sin2t)

and since cos2t + sin2t = 1 we can finally re-write this as:

dy/dx = = et(sintcost - 1)

However my textbook answer states that:
dy/dx = = et(2cos2t + sintcost - 1)

I'm really not sure where this extra 2cos2t term comes from. Any help?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
McKendrigo said:

Homework Statement


Using the product rule, differentiate the following function:

Homework Equations


y = etsintcost

The Attempt at a Solution


The three term product rule says:

d/dx (uvw) = u'vw + uv'w + uvw'

I find u = et, u' = et, v = sint, v' = cost, w = cost and w' = -sint

Thus, dy/dx = etsintcost + etcos2t - etsin2t

= et(sintcost + cos2t -sin2t)

and since cos2t + sin2t = 1 we can finally re-write this as:

dy/dx = = et(sintcost - 1)

However my textbook answer states that:
dy/dx = = et(2cos2t + sintcost - 1)

I'm really not sure where this extra 2cos2t term comes from. Any help?

Thanks in advance!

Homework Statement


Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

Your mistake was in the substitution you made, if sin^2x+cos^2x=1 then -(sin^2x+cos^2x)=-1 and that isn't what you had in the derivative equation.
 
Arrrrrrgh! Thanks for pointing that out!

Use the double angle forumla:

cos2t - sin2t = 2cos2t -1

instead and it all works out fine.

Thanks again for your help.
 
Yep :smile: Equivalently just rearrange the basic equation sin^2x+cos^2x=1 to sin^2x=1-cos^2x and substitute in, but you probably already know that! :biggrin:
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top