How do I Find Vector b for comp_ab = 2?

AI Thread Summary
To find vector b such that comp_ab = 2 with a = <3, -1>, it's important to understand that comp_ab represents the projection of b onto a, which is not unique. The equation derived from the projection formula, 2 = (3b_1 + b_2) / √10, provides a single equation for b. The discussion clarifies that the projection and component concepts are distinct, and confusion arises from the notation used in the book. Additionally, the participants express a need for clearer understanding of vector operations and notation, particularly regarding dot products. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of grasping the underlying concepts of vector projections to solve the problem effectively.
0range
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If a=<3,-1> , find vector b such that comp_ab=2

Homework Equations


comp_ab=\frac{a.b}{|a|}

The Attempt at a Solution



Still not entirely surecomp_ab is, exactly... is it C in the below?
108a8wg.jpg


Lost...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you understand that there is not a unique answer? The "projection of b on a" is the length of the "near side" of a lying along vector a while vector b is the hypotenuse. Given any angle for b, there exist some length that makes the projection 2.

In any case, you wrote a formula for the projection,
proj_a b= \frac{a\cdot b}{|a|}
but don't use it. If you write b= &lt;b_1, b_2&gt; then that formula becomes
2= \frac{3b_1+ b_2}{\sqrt{10}}

That gives a single equation for b.

I have no idea what that \sqrt{40} is supposed to be.

Also, it a\cdot b= c\dot b, it does NOT follow that a= c. Vectors do not cancel that way.
 
Hi, thanks for taking the time to help. It's really appreciated.

I have a vague understanding that this question isn't asking for a single answer. Your explanation is helpful.

Isn't it comp, and not proj? (This is what my book gives, at least.) I didn't use it because I don't really understand what it is, and what it is saying.

I'm not sure if I'll be able to type what I'm thinking without it being too confusing... but in the hopes that you can tell me if I've misunderstood, or whatever the case may be... if it is too confusing, I'll make a diagram when I get home from work and post it.

I was trying to go from the fact that given a vector a and vector b, there is an orthogonal that is b-proj_ab. And proj_ab is some constant C times a.

So, if you substitute Ca for proj_ab you get (b-ca) . a = 0

and

a.b - ca . a = 0

a . b = ca . a

\frac{a . b}{a . a} = c

so proj_ab=\frac{a . b}{a . a}a

Is this wrong?

edit: Is there a better way to write dot products than just putting a decimal in?
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top