MHB How Do I Identify the Net of a Cube?

  • Thread starter Thread starter susanto3311
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cube Net
susanto3311
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
hello everybody...

i have problem, how to easy find & identify a net of the cube..

do you have a easy tricks/method to figure it out this problem?

thanks..
 

Attachments

  • nets problem.jpg
    nets problem.jpg
    4 KB · Views: 104
Mathematics news on Phys.org
susanto3311 said:
hello everybody...

i have problem, how to easy find & identify a net of the cube..

do you have a easy tricks/method to figure it out this problem?

thanks..

To identify the net of a cube, you must observe 6 squares (since a cube has 6 sides).
Either one square should have 3 adjacent squares, or 2 squares should have 2 adjacent squares, or both.

Follow the same procedure to find the net of a cube. Like This :

 

Attachments

  • 11nets_cube.gif
    11nets_cube.gif
    2.4 KB · Views: 98
phymat said:
To identify the net of a cube, you must observe 6 squares (since a cube has 6 sides).
Either one square should have 3 adjacent squares, or 2 squares should have 2 adjacent squares, or both.

Follow the same procedure to find the net of a cube. Like This :


hi phymat...

it's great, very educational..

thanks.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
2
Replies
78
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
33
Views
3K
Back
Top