How do I know if its me or my study habits?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ritzycat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Study
AI Thread Summary
Struggles with exam performance in physics are highlighted, emphasizing the frustration of investing significant study time yet achieving only low scores. Despite feeling confident in understanding the material during review sessions, the individual consistently loses points on tests, suggesting a disconnect between knowledge and test-taking skills. The discussion raises concerns about whether a lack of understanding in fundamental physics indicates an unsuitability for pursuing related fields like engineering. Suggestions for improvement focus on refining study habits, emphasizing continuous learning rather than cramming, and addressing potential difficulties in interpreting exam questions. The importance of effective study strategies and the belief that intelligence is not the sole determinant of success in challenging subjects are also noted, encouraging a shift in mindset towards more productive study techniques.
Ritzycat
Messages
170
Reaction score
4
I am tired of getting sub-par scores on exams. I do not know what I am doing wrong, or if I am simply just not intelligent enough to handle the material. For the last test in Physics I spent 4-5+ hours/day for 4-5 days studying prior by doing practice problems, reviewing material I do not understand and seeing my teacher for help. However, it still came out to be a very low B. When I am reviewing I feel like I am understanding. I feel like I understand almost everything I am doing on the tests. Yet I still lose a lot of points on the stuff I understood very well the days prior. And it is not due to silly mistakes, it is me doing something completely wrong even though I felt I had

I am tired of this because nothing seems to be working. I do not want to waste time on something if I cannot do well in it despite countless hours of attempting to succeed. I do not think determination or drive is enough because it obviously is not for me. I am unable to tell if I am doing something wrong or if I do not have the mental capabilities do perform well.

For those of you who have historically not done well in science, how were you able to perform better? Are there people that simply cannot grasp these concepts and it may be more worth my time to spend time elsewhere? If I can't understand fundamental physics concepts in high school I do not think I should even be thinking about pursuing it in college.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try engineering.
 
Well, I can't do that quite yet considering I'm still a senior in high school.

But I'll give engineering a try when I get to college if the university offers it.

It still raises the same question though, how would I be any better at engineering than physics?
 
A few thoughts:

1) I'm probably lifting a lot of eyebrows by saying this but I don't approve with the "studying for tests/exams" concept. Ideally I study right after every day after school or after each lecture until I am confident that I understand everything taught. I should only need a few reminder on memorization intensive stuff before tests/exams/assessments.

2) From your description it looks like you are capable of grasping the concept but you have trouble understanding the questions. I may have misinterpreted your post thought, your first paragraph looks cut off. If understanding questions is indeed your problem, then ask your teacher to help you with that. You should be able to find patterns and certain keywords to identify what the questions are looking for.

3) "Not good with physics? Do engineering". Jokes aside, this is not how things work at all. Science and engineering aim to achieve different goals and therefore require different ways to approach problems. In a oversimplified way of looking at things, engineers may solve less rigorous (rigor isn't very well defined btw...) problems, but they have to worry about practical complications to greater extents. Besides, if you do something with a mindset of "I'm doing this before I'm not smart enough for (inset whatever you wanted to go for)," you are going to be miserable for quite a while.
 
Your experience isn't exactly uncommon, and it's almost certainly your study habits. Fortunately, it's fixable. First, you should rid yourself of the notion that you do not have the intelligence to succeed. Succeeding requires effort, but as you've discovered, effort alone is not enough. You need to use your time effectively. Succeeding at physics requires understanding. It's one of those subjects where you really can't fake it for too long before it catches up to you.

These presentation slides are from Dr. Saundra McGuire, a chemistry professor who learned how to help students just like you:

http://www2.palomar.edu/stem/events/Fall2014/Palomar%20College%20Students%202014.pdf

It's geared toward college students, but the ideas are relevant for all students.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Back
Top