How do I present solutions for sin (x+y)=sin (5x+z) with restricted values of x?

  • Thread starter Thread starter primarygun
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Presentation
AI Thread Summary
To solve the equation sin(x+y) = sin(5x+z) with restricted values of x, it is essential to first derive the general solution, which is x = nπ + (-1)^nα, where n is an integer. When substituting values, especially within the range -π < x < π, using transformations like [2π-(5x+z)] or [pi-(5x+z)] can help, but alternative approaches such as [6π-(5x+z)] may be necessary in some cases. It is crucial to ensure that any derived solutions fall within the specified range, as multiple valid solutions can exist. Presenting the general solution first and then specializing it to the required range is a logical and safer approach. This method allows for clarity and ensures all potential solutions are considered.
primarygun
Messages
233
Reaction score
0
Sometimes, I don't know how to present an answer well.
For sin (x+y)=sin (5x+z)
For y and z are constant. You may subsitute some value into it.
If the range of x is restricted to -\pi &lt; x &lt; \pi,
naturally we will use [2pi-(5x+z)] or [pi-(5x+z)]. However, in some situation as I mentioned before, the required x value cannot be found in this way. Perhaps,
we need to use [6pi-(5x+z)]=x+y instead to find out the value in the required range. How should I present? Generally, no one subs. pi and 2pi , then 5 pi , it's very strange, some marks maybe conserved for this reason.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'll give you a hint... (I hope it's not the whole thing or I'll get fired at).

The general solution for the equation \sin x = \sin\alpha is x = n\pi + (-1)^n\alpha where n is an integer (positive, negative or zero). A proof of this assertion is available in Plane Trigonometry by SL Loney. Try and convince yourself that this is so.

Also, sometimes you may have (or come up with) two different looking solutions to an equation. Plug in values for the integer parameter to make sure they yield the same values for the angle.
 
Last edited:
I know of it. I have found it myself too. But the problem is, if the answer was restricted to a range. Sometimes, as I mentioned before, the solution needed to use 5pi, then 2pi, then 10pi, it seems that you are just "creating" the method rather than finding it with a superb way. What should I write? [BY FINDING]?
 
Well, depending on your texbook, instructor or course conventions, there can be different meanings to the word principal angle and particular solution. For a particular solution, you must first find a general solution and specialize to the case required. As a concrete example, suppose you have to find a solution of the equation \sin\alpha = \frac{1}{2} in [- \frac{\pi}{2},\frac{\pi}{2} ]. While you can write \sin\alpha = \sin\frac{\pi}{6} and then write \alpha = \frac{\pi}{6}, this is conceptually incorrect as the first equation does not lead to the second unless you concern yourself only with a particular value of the angle. In general, it is safer and logically correct to write instead the general solution, which is, \alpha = n\pi + (-1)^{n}\frac{\pi}{6} and specialize by using a value of n (in this case 0) to make sure that \alpha lies in the required range.

In a problem therefore write the general solution first and then give values ot the integer parameter to determine the values which lie in the required range. This method is good also because sometimes there is more than one solution over a specified range and it's not always obvious. But why miss it? There's no general rule to determine what value of n you have to assign but that is usually obvious from the form of the general solution obtained and the required constraints.

Hope that helps...

Cheers
Vivek
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top