How do I solve a surface charge problem for a cylindrical drum?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pulser45
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Surface
AI Thread Summary
To solve the surface charge problem for a cylindrical drum, the electric field near the surface is given as 2 x 10^5 N/C. The charge density can be calculated using the relationship E = σ/ε0, where σ is the surface charge density and ε0 is the permittivity of free space. The total charge can then be found by multiplying the charge density by the surface area of the drum, Q = σ * (2πrL). There is frustration expressed regarding an online homework system that only accepts exact answers without partial credit. Accurate calculations and understanding of the relationships between electric field, charge density, and total charge are crucial for solving this problem.
pulser45
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi, I need help with a surface charge problem:

The cylindrical drum of a copy machine is 40 cm long and has a radius of 5 cm. If charge is uniformly distributed over the curved surface of the drum, and the electric field near the surface is 2 x 10^5 N/C, estimate the amount of charge on the drum.

I know you set the electric flux to Q/E0. I calculated the Q = o*2pi*r*L. Since electric flux E(2*pi*r*L) should cancel out 2pi*r*L when setting them both equally, leaving E=o/E0. However, i still keep getting the wrong answer. Thanks for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks ok to me. You probably used your Gaussian surface (cilinder) having the same radius as the cilinder itself, because you know the field very near the surface. This way you can cancel the r's, giving o=E/E0.
So multipy the charge density by the surface area to get the total charge.

Alternatively, you could've used E(2*pi*r*L)=Q/E0
and plug in the numbers immediately to find Q.
 
This way you can cancel the r's, giving o=E/E0.

Wouldn't o=E*E0 ? So i would just multiply o by 2*pi*r*L and I would be fine?

My professor adopted this online homework website from ilrn. IMHO, its horrible, because it will only accept the exact answer that was entered. No partial credit given at all because you don't even show your work. Thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top