How do I solve a system of equations with multiple unknowns?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a system of equations to find the values of A, B, and C from a partial fraction decomposition problem. The original equations provided include 2A + B + 2C = 1, 3A + 2B - C = 2, and -2A = -1, which was later clarified as a typo. The user initially struggled with understanding how the values A = 1/2, B = 1/5, and C = -1/10 were derived but ultimately realized the solution was straightforward algebra. The conversation highlights the importance of recognizing the algebraic nature of the problem despite its origin in partial fractions.
ProBasket
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
original question: \int (x^2+2x-1)/(x(2x-1)(x+2))

the following is from my math book:
2A + B + 2C = 1
3A + 2B - C = 2
-2A = -1

okay i understand everything the math has done up to this point, this is the point that i don't get:

A = 1/2, B = 1/5, C = -1/10

i think the book got A from solving this equation: -2A = -1

I just want to know how the book got A, B, and C.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If those are the values for A, B and C given in the book, apparently -2A=1 was supposed to be 2A=1. Otherwise all those values are wrong.

(But what does that have to do with partial fractions?)
 
gnome said:
If those are the values for A, B and C given in the book, apparently -2A=1 was supposed to be 2A=1. Otherwise all those values are wrong.

(But what does that have to do with partial fractions?)

my bad, it was a typo. it's suppose to be -2A = -1

and it has to do with partial fractions because it's a partial fractions question.
 
Sure, the question came from a partial fraction problem... but partial fractions have nothing to do with its solution.

The problem is now purely algebraic: you have a system of equations with several unknowns. Do you remember anything from your algebra classes about solving them?
 
Hurkyl said:
Sure, the question came from a partial fraction problem... but partial fractions have nothing to do with its solution.

The problem is now purely algebraic: you have a system of equations with several unknowns. Do you remember anything from your algebra classes about solving them?


nevermind, i got it. wow i can't believe i didnt get it. i was thinking too hard
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top