How Do Mechanics and Statics Problems Calculate Movement and Force?

  • Thread starter Thread starter blackbody
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving mechanics and statics problems involving forces, movement, and energy dissipation. In the first problem, the user analyzes a system with a spring, two masses, and friction, seeking to determine the movement of mass2 and energy lost to friction. They are advised to apply the work-energy theorem to find the energy dissipated by friction and to clarify the initial conditions of kinetic and potential energy. The second problem involves a uniform beam supported by wedges with boxes on top, where the user is trying to establish stability conditions and the point at which the normal force at one wedge becomes zero. Feedback indicates the need for consistent distance measurements in torque calculations and highlights the relationship between the weights of the boxes for stability.
blackbody
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I just want to verify that my thought process for these problems is valid, any help would be appreciated. (I have pictures attached for each problem for clarity)

1) You have mass1 attached to a spring with a certain spring constant k, it rests on a tabletop with a force of friction with a coefficient \mu. Attached to mass1 is an ideal cord that extends over the table over an ideal pulley which holds mass2. a) If the spring is compressed a certain amount, and then released (spring stretches an amount x, smaller than max displacement), how far does mass2 move down? b) How much energy is dissipated by friction?

a) Ok, so I set my coordinate system as positive for mass1 to the right, and for mass2 positive is down. I'm assuming the accelerations for both blocks is equal?

For mass1 = \sum F_x = kx + F_T - \mu m_1g = m_1a

For mass2= \sum F_y = m_2g - F_T = m_2a

So I solve for a in both equations, set them equal to each other, and I get:

F_T = \frac{m_2(m_1g + \mu m_1g - kx)}{m_1 + m_2}

a = m_2(g - m_1g + \mu m_1g - kx)

Ok, times to stop for m_1 and m_2 are equal, but I don't know where to go from here.

b) I think I'm supposed to use the work energy theorem to figure out how much energy was dissipated by friction...but are the initial kinetic and potential energies of the system 0?

2) STATICS problem:
You have a uniform beam of length (l), mass M, supported by two wedges, Q and P. There are two boxes, W1 and W2 on top of the beam; each box has a different distance from the center of mass of the beam. a) What masses of W1 and W2 is the system stable? b) At which configuration does the normal force at Q goes to zero?

Ok, the second picture attached should help on the setup of the problem.

My solution:
Ok, so I need the \sum \tau around P to = 0, as well as the net force:

(counter-clockwise positive)
\sum \tau = W_1 A + Mg B - W_2 C - F_Q D = 0

\sum F = F_Q + F_P - W_1 - W_2 - Mg = 0

This is where I get stuck, and I'm not even sure these are right. Thanks for the help!
 

Attachments

  • problem.gif
    problem.gif
    2.2 KB · Views: 527
  • problem2.gif
    problem2.gif
    1 KB · Views: 556
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In question 1:
a) I would rather suggest the use of work-energy relationships. There is work done by a non-conservative force (friction) which is equal to the difference in mechanical energy of the system.

W_{nc} = \Delta ME = \Delta (KE + GPE + EPE),

where,

KE = \frac{1}{2}mv^2,

GPE = mgh,

EPE = \frac{1}{2}kx^2.

Denoting by s the displacement, then we setup the equation:

-\mu m_1gs = (0 + m_2gs + \frac{1}{2}kx^2) - (0 + 0 + 0)

Simplify this and solve for s.

b) If you found s you can also determine

W_f = -\mu mgs
 
Thanks, that helped, and ideas for problem 2?
 
blackbody said:
Thanks, that helped, and ideas for problem 2?
blackbody said:
2) STATICS problem:
You have a uniform beam of length (l), mass M, supported by two wedges, Q and P. There are two boxes, W1 and W2 on top of the beam; each box has a different distance from the center of mass of the beam. a) What masses of W1 and W2 is the system stable? b) At which configuration does the normal force at Q goes to zero?

Ok, the second picture attached should help on the setup of the problem.

My solution:
Ok, so I need the \sum \tau around P to = 0, as well as the net force:

(counter-clockwise positive)
\sum \tau = W_1 A + Mg B - W_2 C - F_Q D = 0

\sum F = F_Q + F_P - W_1 - W_2 - Mg = 0

This is where I get stuck, and I'm not even sure these are right. Thanks for the help!

\sum \tau = W_1 A + Mg B - W_2 C - F_Q D = 0

Two of your distances in this equation are incorrect. All distances must be measured from the same rotation axis. Your other equation is OK. Stability can be achieved for many different values of W1 and W2, but there will be a relatioship between them. The normal force at Q will go to zero when W2 is sufficiently heavier than W1. At that condition, one term in both your equations will drop out
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top