How do the laws of thermodynamics affect hydrogen on demand systems?

  • Thread starter Thread starter october
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hydrogen Systems
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of thermodynamics to hydrogen on-demand systems, particularly in vehicles. The law of conservation of energy indicates that these systems cannot provide a net gain in energy, as losses in processes like electrolysis and battery recharging offset any gains. Some proponents claim that hydrogen improves fuel efficiency, but the absence of manufacturer adoption suggests skepticism about their effectiveness. The conversation also highlights concerns about the production rate of hydrogen compared to engine air intake and the safety risks associated with handling both hydrogen and oxygen gases. Overall, the complexities and inefficiencies of current engine designs may hinder the success of hydrogen on-demand systems.
october
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I was wondering if someone could explain how the laws of thermodynamics apply to these so called hydrogen on demand systems and or how these laws govern the operations of these systems. Physics is my next college course but, I am not asking this for any assignments I have, just a personal interest.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you thinking of products designed to be fitted to a car to improve mpg or allow your car to "run on water"?

They use electricity from the car battery to turn water into hydrogen (and oxygen) which is then burned in the engine where it turns back into "water".

The law of conservation of energy says there should be no net gain. In practice the power gain in the engine will be more than offset buy losses (eg in the alternator that recharges the battery, or in the electrolysis of the water).

However some people claim that the hydrogen doesn't just turn back into water in the engine. They claim it allows the fuel to burn more efficiently.

The fact that car manufacturers don't fit such systems as standard is proof they don't work.

It's also interesting to compare the rate of hydrogen production from these devices with the rate at which a carb sucks in air.
 
yeah, that was something else I didn't get. The rate a carb sucks in air. I have a 600 holley on my vehicle. It sucks in 600 cubic feet of air a minute. That's a lot of air, (I hope that's right, cubic feet and not inches) Either way, I have never seen an on demand system that could keep up with that. I did look at the CNG systems ford has. They use a specially designed tank that holds CNG at 3600 psi. In order to be efficient in running the vehicle, it has to be regulated down to 125 psi going into the engine. It also requires a special fuel rail (modification)attachment. For the good system you can set aside about 12000 dollars too. I would think the same would be true for the hydro gas too wouldn't it? Also in those "on-demand" systems, are they using both pure hydrogen gas and oxygen? Pure oxygen is pretty volatile itself. By their self both of those gases are explosive. If they are right then they should have two separate tanks, one to collect the hydrogen and one for the oxygen? I know pure hydrogen is as volatile as gasoline but, I've heard pure oxygen is worse. Sounds like dangerous stuff if the right precautions are not taken to control, compress and regulate these systems. Could explain all the mis-haps I've seen too...But hey they're trying. Maybe they need to start with re-designing the inefficient engine they are putting these on, that are designed to burn liquid fuel and not gas.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
I know that mass does not affect the acceleration in a simple pendulum undergoing SHM, but how does the mass on the spring that makes up the elastic pendulum affect its acceleration? Certainly, there must be a change due to the displacement from equilibrium caused by each differing mass? I am talking about finding the acceleration at a specific time on each trial with different masses and comparing them. How would they compare and why?
Back
Top