How do two layer voice coils work?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Frosteh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coils Work
AI Thread Summary
Double wound voice coils feature two layers of wire wound in opposite directions, enhancing the magnetic field's strength and precision compared to single wound coils. The leads at the top of the coil serve as exit points for the electrical current, which flows through the entire length of both layers, ensuring they are charged and contribute to sound production. Insulation on the wire prevents short circuits, allowing for effective operation without mechanical damage. The interaction between the voice coil's magnetic field and the speaker's permanent magnet is crucial for sound generation. Understanding these principles clarifies how double wound voice coils function and their advantages in audio performance.
Frosteh
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I understand how single layer/wound voice coils work, where the positive lead is at one end of the coil and the negative is at the other, but how do double wound coils work where both leads terminate at the top? See photos below for what I mean by double and single wound. On the double wound, wouldn't the electrical charge take the shortest route and not even charge the layers below the two leads since it would just go straight to the negative lead? What am I missing/not understanding?

Single wound:
Speaker22.jpg


Double wound:
speaker23.jpg
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Unless I completely musinderstood the question, you seem to be missing the fact that the wire is insulated. The insulation is a thin coat of material sprayed onto the wire which gives ithe shiry appearance. For this sort of application, you don't need thick flexible plastic insulation to protect the wire against mechanical damage and withstand repeated bending without cracking, whcih you see in most housefold electrical wiring.
 
Well gee, now I feel like a dunce. :wink: I wasn't aware that there was insulation on it! I thought copper wire was just that, copper wire. Now it makes sense. Thanks for clearing that up! :)
 
Frosteh said:
Well gee, now I feel like a dunce. :wink: I wasn't aware that there was insulation on it! I thought copper wire was just that, copper wire. Now it makes sense. Thanks for clearing that up! :)

dont feel too bad... its all a learning process :)

but also think about your reasoned comment ... if it was bare copper, even just a single layer would short out as well ;)

but note, bare copper wire is a very different colour, the colour you are seeing there, a dark, brownish colour is the enamel insulation on the wire.
then they dip the whole lot in lacquer to keep the turns of wire held in place
This form of insulation is used on most coils, be they transformers, plain inductors, voice coils as you have shown.
It is also common to see an almost transparent enamel used on more modern coils where the colour of the copper is somewhat more obviousDave
 


First of all, let's clarify the purpose of a voice coil in a speaker. A voice coil is a wire wound around a cylindrical former that is attached to the speaker cone. When an electrical current flows through the voice coil, it creates a magnetic field which interacts with the permanent magnet in the speaker, causing the voice coil and cone to move and produce sound.

In a single wound voice coil, as you mentioned, the positive and negative leads are located at opposite ends of the coil. When an electrical current flows through the coil, it creates a magnetic field that is evenly distributed throughout the entire coil. This magnetic field interacts with the permanent magnet to produce sound.

Now, in a double wound voice coil, both leads terminate at the top of the coil. This means that the electrical current flows through the entire length of the coil before exiting at the top. The key difference here is that the coil is wound in two layers, with the top layer wound in the opposite direction of the bottom layer. This creates a more complex magnetic field that is stronger and more evenly distributed, resulting in a more precise and powerful sound.

To address your concern about the electrical charge taking the shortest route, it's important to understand that the electrical current is flowing through the entire length of the coil, not just between the two leads. This means that both layers are being charged and contributing to the overall magnetic field. The leads at the top simply serve as the exit points for the electrical current.

In summary, a double wound voice coil works by utilizing two layers of wire wound in opposite directions to create a stronger and more precise magnetic field. The leads at the top serve as the exit points for the electrical current, but the current still flows through the entire length of the coil, charging both layers. This allows for a more powerful and accurate sound production. I hope this helps clarify any confusion.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top