How Do You Apply Newton's Law to Solve Incline Problems?

AI Thread Summary
To solve incline problems using Newton's Law, first break down the forces acting on the mass into components parallel and perpendicular to the incline. In the given example, a 20N horizontal force acts on a 10kg mass on a frictionless incline at a 30-degree angle. The relevant forces include the parallel component of the applied force and the gravitational force. The net force acting on the mass is the difference between these parallel components. Finally, apply Newton's second law, F=ma, to find the acceleration up the incline.
r3dxP
well, my question isn't directly towards Newton's law or anythiing, but its a question on how to solve problems using Newton's law.
for example, look at this problem below..

a force of 20N acts horizontally on a mass of 10kg being pushed up a fritionless incline that makes a 30degrees angle with the horizontal. What is the magnitude of the acceleration of the mass up the incline equal to?

ok, for this problem, how would you know you solve this problem by using the equilibrium in respect to the x ? is it because only x equilibrium exists? or is it because its asking for the magnitude of the acceleration up the incline?
sorry if this question confuses you..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem specifically asks for acceleration! There is no equilibrium here.

Break the horizontal force into components, one parallel to the incline, the other perpendicular to it. Only the force parallel to the incline will move the mass up the incline. Also break the vertical gravity force into those same components- one parallel to the incline, the other perpendicular to it. Again, only the component parallel to the incline is important. The net force, up or down the incline, is the parallel component of the force applied minus the parallel component of gravitational force. Then, of course, use F= ma.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top