How Do You Build a Crumple Zone for an Egg Drop with Toothpicks?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Frank_Horrigan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Building
AI Thread Summary
To build a crumple zone for an egg drop using toothpicks and glue, designs should focus on creating a structure that absorbs impact effectively while staying under the 50 g weight limit. Suggestions include using square or triangular bases connected by varying numbers of toothpicks to optimize flexibility and crumple length. The octet truss design, while theoretically strong, poses challenges in construction due to complex joints, which can compromise structural integrity if not executed properly. Emphasis should be placed on creating simple, effective joints to ensure strength while allowing for controlled breakage during impact. Ultimately, the goal is to maximize the stopping distance and distribute force evenly to protect the egg.
Frank_Horrigan
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
For a school project I have to build a device made of only toothpicks and glue gun glue that will hold an egg. The device will be dropped 5 meters and the egg must not break, so the idea is to build a device with a good crumple zone. I have a few ideas about how to build it but its pretty hard to find advice on how they are made, I can only find info on how they work. Oh yea it has to have a mass of 50 g or less, that's a lot of toothpicks.

If someone could comment on my ideas, or suggest different variations it would be great. Here are my ideas.

1. Build a crumple zone where the base is made of squares each connected to a square above them by 4 toothpicks.

2. Same idea as above but use only 2 toothpicks to connect squares (therefore its weaker, which means I can have a longer crumple zone right?)

3. Make the base triangles that are connected to above triangles with 2 toothpicks.

4. Attempt to make it a shape sort of like a blimp? I have my doubts on this one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone have any ideas?
 
I expect that if the toothpicks are vertical they will not flex or break;
the Energy absorbed will only be in the glue coming undone.

It might be good to connect vertical toothpick posts
to the center of horizontal toothpick beams, so the beams will break.

If the posts are not vertical, but all slanted one direction,
you might be able to change vertical motion into rotational motion.
 
Hmm well with the vertical thing I've tried it a few times and it seems that the sticks do break. I don't really understand what you mean about rotational motion though, if you think it will help for my project please explain.

I was thinking that I need the structure to be very long and have the impact part break very easily over a long distance right? In this I am trying to create the longest stopping distance with equal force at all moments on the egg I think. So the best way to do this would b to have it reasonably weak but for as long of a time possible. Anyone have ideas how i would do this? or what shape would be the best to use that will break easily?
 
I rather like Buckminister Fuller's "Octet truss" consisting of tetrahedrons and octahedrons. You should be able to find diagrams if you look on the WWW. I have never actually seen this applied to egg drops, I don't have any emperical data on how well it works.
 
Some more feedback, after a little bit of fooling around with real toothpicks. The octet truss will probably theoretically be a very strong design, but it will be very hard to build correctly because of the joints.

If you put the joints of your toothpicks together haphazardly, the structure will not be very strong, defeating the purpose of the structure. You have to imagine that you are building on a larger scale, and use good joints.

The joint structre for a octet truss design can have up to 12 beams (toothpicks) meeting at a point, making it a difficult build. I think the best practical approach will be to engineer the structure for the simplest possible joint configuration.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top