How Do You Calculate Apparent Depth and Light Angle in Water?

  • Thread starter Thread starter RoseCrye
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Depth
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the angle at which light exits water and the apparent depth of a light source submerged at 2.60 meters, Snell's Law is applied with an index of refraction for water at 1.33. The initial attempts to determine the angle using both Snell's Law and trigonometry yielded incorrect results, prompting further clarification on the setup. Observers' positions significantly affect the apparent depth calculation, with direct overhead views simplifying the approach. A critical angle question regarding a special glass submerged in water was also posed, requiring the use of the glass's index of refraction of 1.466. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly setting up problems based on the observer's perspective and the medium involved.
RoseCrye
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
there's a light source, S, sitting 2.60 metres below the surface of a pool 1.00 metres away from one side. I'm supposed to find the angle at which the light left the water and the difference between the apparent and actual depths of the light source.



i attempted using Snell's Law with n of water = 1.33 and the incedent angle = 90 degrees. 1.33(sin90)=1.00(sin_theta) I got theta=1.33. that can't be right.

I also tried trig. Theta is the angle of a rt triangle with the light source. 2.60 is the opposite, 1.00 is adjacent. Using the cot_theta, my answer was 69 degrees. neither of these answers was accepted by WebAssign.



HELP!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Also, there is a question as to how to find the critical angle of a "special glass" (the index of refraction of which I am not given... o.O) when submerged in water. Hereis the question:

"The critical angle for a special glass in air is 43°. What is the critical angle if the glass is immersed in water?"

I tried to use sin_theta=1/n, but I couldn't figure out how to set up the problem. Someone have an idea?
 
It depends on where you are looking from.
If you are directly above the light then, as you said i=90deg and the light goes straight out - the apparent depth is then just real_depth/n.

If you are standing on the side of the pool then just draw a triangle, and the real depth is the hypotenuse.
 
mgb_phys said:
It depends on where you are looking from.
If you are directly above the light then, as you said i=90deg and the light goes straight out - the apparent depth is then just real_depth/n.

If you are standing on the side of the pool then just draw a triangle, and the real depth is the hypotenuse.

but if you go from the standpoint that the observer is @ the side of the pool, how do you find the apparent depth?
 
RoseCrye said:
Also, there is a question as to how to find the critical angle of a "special glass" (the index of refraction of which I am not given... o.O) when submerged in water. Hereis the question:

"The critical angle for a special glass in air is 43°. What is the critical angle if the glass is immersed in water?"

I tried to use sin_theta=1/n, but I couldn't figure out how to set up the problem. Someone have an idea?

By the way, i worked it out, the index of refraction for the glass is 1.466, if that helps anyone... i just need at setup for this, I'm not asking for a solution.
 
mgb_phys said:
It depends on where you are looking from.
If you are directly above the light then, as you said i=90deg and the light goes straight out - the apparent depth is then just real_depth/n.

If you are standing on the side of the pool then just draw a triangle, and the real depth is the hypotenuse.

WAITAMINNIT...
sorry, that didn't register... thnx.
 
mgb_phys said:
It depends on where you are looking from.
If you are directly above the light then, as you said i=90deg and the light goes straight out - the apparent depth is then just real_depth/n.

If you are standing on the side of the pool then just draw a triangle, and the real depth is the hypotenuse.

this didn't work.

what i did:
Pythag. theorem => hyp=2.78m
D(apparant)=D(real)/n
D(apparant)=2.78/1.33
D(apparant)=2.09
Difference = .69m

This answer was deemed incorrect.

Say that ang.B=rt ang. Ang.A=observer's eyes to S (the angle that the light meets the water/air boundary to the normal inside the water). Ang.C=S to ang.B

tanA=2.6/1
tanA=2.6
tan-1A= 68.96

Should i input this angle into Snell's Law?
 
RoseCrye said:
By the way, i worked it out, the index of refraction for the glass is 1.466, if that helps anyone... i just need at setup for this, I'm not asking for a solution.

Now that you have n for the glass, just try applying the same reasoning now that it is in the water instead of the air, and solve for theta.
 
hage567 said:
Now that you have n for the glass, just try applying the same reasoning now that it is in the water instead of the air, and solve for theta.

what are you mean? Put it in Snell's Law?
 
  • #10
Well yes, for the special case of a critical angle.
 
  • #11
Tried pitting it in Snell's, hage, but it didn't work... I came out with 38.22 degrees, and used 43 degrees as the incedent angle.

how do i find the crit angle in the water? if i use the glass' n, i'd only get 43 degrees again. i think i need the index of refraction at the water/glass boundary. but i am so confused...
 
  • #12
You know that n=1.466 for the glass, and n=1.33 for the water (looking it up).
 
  • #13
How do you set up snell's law for a critical angle?! i thought snell's law didn't work with critical angles...
 
  • #15
theta1 with which n, glass or water?
 
  • #16
GOT IT! Thanks, hage!
 
  • #17
got some insight into the other problem of mine?
 
  • #18
mgb_phys said:
It depends on where you are looking from.
If you are directly above the light then, as you said i=90deg and the light goes straight out - the apparent depth is then just real_depth/n.

If you are standing on the side of the pool then just draw a triangle, and the real depth is the hypotenuse.

to find the apparent depth, real depth over the n of what? tried it with the n of the water, and it's telling me it's wrong.
 
Back
Top