How Do You Calculate Constant Particle Density in a Star Cluster?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AbigailM
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density Star
AbigailM
Messages
46
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A large, spherically symmetric collection of point particles of mass m move in circular orbits about a common center each with the same kinetic energy. If the only force acting is the mutual gravitational attraction of the particles, find the particle density (in the continuum limit) as a function of r from the center in order that the density remain constant in time.

Homework Equations


F=\frac{GMm}{R^{2}} ,where M is the total mass.

\frac{v^{2}}{R}=\frac{GM}{R^{2}}

The Attempt at a Solution


\frac{F}{m}=\frac{GM}{R^{2}}

\frac{4\pi F}{m}=\frac{4\pi GM}{R^{2}}

dM=\rho(R)R^{2}dR4\pi

dM=\frac{v^{2}}{G}dR

\rho(R)=\frac{v^{2}}{4\pi GR^{2}}

\frac{1}{2}mv^{2}=\frac{GMm}{r} solve for v and substitute into prev. equation.

\rho(R)=\frac{GM}{2\pi R^{3}}

Is this looking ok? Thanks for the help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure if I understand the question. I would imagine that if you have a continuous distribution of stuff on spherical orbits, then the density is always constant in time. In order to find a unique density, you need to specify the velocity of each shell, v(R).

For example, suppose you have v(R) = constant. Then you'd find
\frac{v^2}{R} = \frac{GM}{R^2} \rightarrow M \propto v^2 R \propto R
and therefore dM/dR = constant... Then
\frac{dM}{dR} = 4 \pi R^2 \rho \rightarrow \rho \propto R^{-2}.
On the other hand, suppose you want your system to rotate like a rigid body, with v \propto R. Then
M \propto R^3
and ρ=constant.

Also having \rho \propto R^{-3} seems really suspicious to me, as this means that M diverges if you integrate to R=0.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top