How Do You Calculate Electric Flux Through a Paraboloidal Surface?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheChicken
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrical Flux
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the electric flux through a paraboloidal surface in a constant electric field, Gauss' Law can be effectively applied. The total electric flux can be determined by considering the flux through the entire surface and the circular face at one end. While the shape may seem complex, the problem is designed to encourage the use of conceptual understanding rather than intricate calculations. The discussion highlights the importance of recognizing that the electric field is uniform and the need to identify the value of "Q" for the volume inside the paraboloid. Utilizing these insights can simplify the problem-solving process significantly.
TheChicken
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://img362.imageshack.us/img362/8044/p2413zn4.gif

Calculate the total electric flux through the paraboloidal surface due to a constant electric field of magnitude E0 in the direction shown in Figure P24.13. (Use E_0 for E0, and r and d as necessary.)

Homework Equations



E = (ke +q-q)/r2
flux = EA cos theta
flux = Q/ e_0

The Attempt at a Solution



I have no idea how to solve this problem, or any other problems on this assignment for that matter. This seems to be beyond what the book actually covers, and I have no idea what to do. Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ah, you have had Gauss' Law: that's the third equation you wrote (flux = Q/ e_0).

What does Q represent in that equation? What is the value of "Q" for the volume inside the paraboloid surface?
 
Yeah, this vector field has no divergence due to a lack of sources or sinks. If you don't know what I'm talking about, nevermind, and just listen to dynamicsolo. But if you've seen Gauss' Law in differential form, then you'll see what I mean.
 
But it's like... it's such a bizarre shape. I tried entering in "E_0((4/3)r^2d)" and that didn't get me anywhere. And even then, when you have the volume, if the electric field is E_0, does that mean it's E_0 per meter cubed?

I know that flux is EA cos theta, but you have to do some ridiculous integrating or something to solve for a 'paraboloid' using that formula.
 
You don't have to do any calculation at all if you employ Gauss law wisely. Read through dynamicsolo's post for hints on how to do so.
 
Well, you have to do a little calculation, but no integrating at all. Ask yourself this: what is the total electric flux through the entire body of this bullet-shaped surface? Then, what is the electric flux through the circular face at one end of the surface? What then must be the flux through the paraboloidal end?

And, yes, it is a bizarre shape -- that's deliberate. In an introductory physics course, that's often a sign in a problem that you're supposed to use a concept, rather than a difficult computation...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top