How Do You Calculate Kinetic Energy of Neutrons for Diffraction Analysis?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the kinetic energy of neutrons for diffraction analysis, the momentum of neutrons with a wavelength equal to the lattice spacing is determined using p = h/lambda, yielding 2.5×10−24 kg m/s. The kinetic energy is calculated using the formula k = 0.5mv², resulting in 1.80×10−21 J, which is confirmed as correct. For the gas temperature of these neutrons, the relationship between kinetic energy and temperature is established as k = (3/2)kT, allowing for rearrangement to find the temperature using Boltzmann's constant. The discussion emphasizes the connection between kinetic energy, momentum, and temperature in the context of neutron diffraction. Overall, the calculations and relationships presented are crucial for understanding neutron behavior in crystal structures.
louza8
Messages
58
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose you want to observe neutron diffraction in a crystal with 0.27nm spacing between lattice planes.

Part A asks for the momentum of neutrons with a wavelength equal to the spacing. I used p = h/lambda to get the correct answer 2.5×10−24kgms-1

Question1:

Find the kinetic energy of neutrons having wavelength equal to this spacing.

Question2:
If these neutrons constituted an ideal gas, what would be the gas temperature?

Homework Equations



Q1. k=0.5mv2
Q2. PV=nRT

The Attempt at a Solution


Q1: I've tried a couple of different methods, don't know if I'm going the right way with this.
k=0.5mv2
0.5(1.67*10^-27)(1.47*10^3)^2 = 1.80*10^-21J

is this correct?
Q2: I have no idea.
Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Q1 is correct.

What is the average kinetic energy of an atom or molecule in an ideal gas?

ehild
 
Ah, cool.

so 0.5mv^2 = (3/2)kT? So just rearrange to get T with k being boltzmann's constant?

Helpful as always ehild. Thanks.
 
I hope it is that easy. Try. ehild
 
correct, thanks
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top