How Do You Calculate Moment of Inertia for Different Axes?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the moment of inertia about an axis through mass A, the formula I = mr^2 is applied, but distances must be squared, and the total mass should not be divided. For the axis through masses B and C, the Pythagorean theorem is used to find the distance, which is then squared in the moment of inertia calculation. The correct approach involves summing the individual moments of inertia for each mass around the specified axis. The initial confusion stemmed from an incorrect attempt to find the center of mass, which is not relevant for this calculation. Properly applying the formulas leads to accurate results for the moment of inertia.
mcnealymt
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



a)Find the moment of inertia about an axis that passes through mass A and is perpendicular to the page. In kg m^2

b)Find the moment of inertia about an axis that passes through masses B and C.In kg m^2

http://session.masteringphysics.com/problemAsset/1070524/4/12.EX16.jpg

Homework Equations



I=mr^2

The Attempt at a Solution



a) (Mass of a * r + Mass of b * r)/ (Total Mass)

.005 They wanted the answer in two sigfigs so I put .05*10^-1 and it was wrong.

b) Used Pythagorean Theorem

sqrt(.10^2- .062)= .08
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
mcnealymt said:
I=mr^2
Good. Just find I for each mass (around the given axis) and add them up to get the total I.

a) (Mass of a * r + Mass of b * r)/ (Total Mass)
You forgot to square the distances. What distance did you use? And why did you divide by the total mass?
 
Doc Al said:
Good. Just find I for each mass (around the given axis) and add them up to get the total I.


You forgot to square the distances. What distance did you use? And why did you divide by the total mass?
That makes sense, for some reason I was trying to find the center of mass which is completely irrelevant.

The distances I used were for a were: (.1kg)(.1m)^2+ (.1kg)(.1m)^2


The distance used for b was .08m (found using Pythagorean)
(.08m)^2(.2kg)
 
Thank you Doc Al, I appreciate it. Have a nice day.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top