How Do You Calculate Probabilities with Non-Coprime Residue Classes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CRGreathouse
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Classes Residue
CRGreathouse
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
2,832
Reaction score
0
Suppose I had a lot of residue classes and I wanted to find the probability that a random integer (mod the product of the moduli) was in at least one of the classes. How could I calculate that?

If the moduli were pairwise coprime, it would be easy: start an accumulator at 0 and for each class a mod m, calculate
acc <- acc + 1/m - acc/m
and return the accumulator. But what if they're not? And what if there are a whole lot of residue classes, and their moduli are both large and fairly smooth (so they are 'far from' being coprime)?

I'm picturing some kind of solution involving tracking products of small primes separately and using some version of the above algorithm for the large, and so probably coprime to everything else, prime factors. But is there a better way? Is there already a program/function/library that can do this for me?

I'm actually reminded of a recent preprint by Neilsen ('a covering set with minimum modulus 40' or something like that), though this is by no means a covering set.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The probability is zero, because there are infinitely many integers and only finitely many elements in the classes. I assume you will need to consider only a certain range of integers. Depending on the size of this range you can calculate the probabilities by counting elements and taking the quotient, the relative frequency.

In case your modules or not coprime, you will find integers which fit in more than one class. So you also need a rule of how to proceed (count) in these cases.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
8K
2
Replies
60
Views
11K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
4
Replies
175
Views
25K
Back
Top