How Do You Calculate the Angle for Retroreflection in a Diffraction Grating?

phantom113
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement

I'm choosing an angle for a diffraction grating such that a laser of particular wavelength λ is retroreflected (reflected back along incident path).

2. Homework Equations
If you have a better way than using the equation below, feel free to explain. The book that I'm looking through treats the blazed diffraction grating as a set of N slits. This results in the equation

I(θ)=\frac{I(0)}{N2}(sinc(β)^{2})(\frac{sin(Nα)}{sin(α)})^{2}

where β=(kb/2)sin(θ) and α=(ka/2)sin(θ) with b=length of slit and a=distance between center of two adjacent slits

k is the wavenumber(I think).


3. The Attempt at a Solution
What I'm looking for is a kick in the right direction. I'm not sure how this equation helps me. I don't know how to use k and and I don't really know a or b (although I could calculate them). I'm not sure how N^2 comes into play since I don't know the total number of slits on the grating. Also I don't know why the total number of slits should play much of a role when the laser is incident on only a tiny portion of the grating. I think there is something fundamental that I'm not understanding. Obviously I want the intensity to be maximized along retroreflected path. Any help would be great. Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Does anyone know how to determine the angle at which to place a diffraction grating such that a particular wavelength of light is reflected back along the path of incidence? Do I need to rephrase the question? Any help is much appreciated.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top