How Do You Calculate the Charge Between Two Asymmetric Cylinders?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the charge on two adjacent asymmetrical cylinders with a voltage applied, the equation Q=CV is applicable, where Q is the charge, C is the capacitance, and V is the voltage. The capacitance depends on the geometry of the cylinders, including their lengths, radii, separation distance, and orientation. When connected to a battery, charge will move from one cylinder to the other to maintain a constant potential difference, resulting in equal and opposite charges on the cylinders. For accurate capacitance measurements, using a capacitance meter or bridge is recommended, as theoretical calculations can be complex and involve many assumptions, especially with asymmetrical shapes.
jleahy
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey all,

I'm trying to calculate the charge that forms on two adjacent and asymetrical cylinders when a voltage is put between them. The figures I was using was something like 1mm radius for one and 10mm radius for the other, a voltage of about 20kV and a separation of a few cm.

I thought of using Q=CV, but I couldn't find the revelant equation for capacitance; that is, if there is one. As they are asymetric I'm not expecting for +Q to form on one and -Q on the other, so I'm unsure as to whether this even applies.

I've also tried using the electric field calculations, using work for voltage and all that, but can't quite work out how to tie all the maths together. Has anybody seen a problem like this before?

Thanks in advance,

Josh
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you have two uncharged asymmetric cylinders and you hook them up to a battery, the battery will move charge from one cylinder to the other in order to maintain a constant potential difference across its terminals. Whatever amount leaves one cylinder must accumulate on the other. So Q=CV is still applicable and the size of Q depends on C which is purely a quantity that depends on the geometry, the length and radius of each cylinder, the separation between them and their relative orientation. A calculation from first principles is usually fraught with assumptions and approximations even if the cylinders are equal in length and aligned with each other to fit inside a plane rectangle. Your best bet would be to measure the capacitance using something like a capacitance meter or bridge. You don't need a formula unless you are in the design stage and you want to optimize some relevant quantity to your application.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top