How Do You Calculate the deBroglie Wavelength of a Relativistic Electron?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chocobo7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum Thank you
AI Thread Summary
The deBroglie wavelength for a relativistic electron can be calculated using the formula lambda=h/p, where p is the relativistic momentum. The user initially attempted to find the velocity using the equation v=c sqrt(1-(Er/K+Er)^2) but encountered difficulties. They also tried using the classical kinetic energy formula KE=1/2mv^2, which is not suitable for relativistic speeds. For the neutron beam question, the user suggests using the kinetic energy to find the wavelength and then applying the single slit diffraction equation, but lacks necessary parameters for a complete solution. The discussion emphasizes the need for accurate application of relativistic physics principles in these calculations.
Chocobo7
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Quantum Phys Questions PLEASE HELP THANK YOU!

DeBroglie postulated that the relationship lambda=h/p is valid for relativistic particles. The Planck's constant is 6.63x10-34 Js. What is the deBroglie wavelength for a relativisitc electron whose kinetic energy is 6.77 MeV? Answer in units of m.
What I did was v=c sqrt (1-(Er/K+Er)^2), solved for v, plugged that into relativistic p=mv/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2), then plugged that into lambda=h/p to solve for lambda, but I got it wrong. I also tried using KE=1/2mv^2.

One more ques: A beam of neutrons with a kinetic energy of .00061 eV falls on a slit of width .0001m. What will be the angular spread of the beam after it passes through the slit? Answer in units of radian.
I have no idea how to do this...the only thing can possibly think of is getting wavelength from the kinetic energy and somehow using the single slit equation to solve for theta? But then I don't have distance from source to slit screen or y (width of bands?)

ANY HELP WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED! I NEED THESE ASAP! THANKS IN ADVANCE!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would post this in the advanced physics forum. You'll get more people who know exactly how to answer all of this there (I could make an educated guess on the first one, but I don't think that's what you're looking for :) )
 
nevermind i got it. -_-
 
Chocobo7 said:
DeBroglie postulated that the relationship lambda=h/p is valid for relativistic particles. The Planck's constant is 6.63x10-34 Js. What is the deBroglie wavelength for a relativisitc electron whose kinetic energy is 6.77 MeV? Answer in units of m.
What I did was v=c sqrt (1-(Er/K+Er)^2), solved for v, plugged that into relativistic p=mv/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2), then plugged that into lambda=h/p to solve for lambda, but I got it wrong. I also tried using KE=1/2mv^2.
QUOTE]

Using KE=1/2mv^2, get the v. Then put v into L=h/mv.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top