How Do You Calculate the Radius of Curvature for a Mirror?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Huskies213
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curvature
AI Thread Summary
The radius of curvature for a mirror is not simply double the distance from the mirror. To calculate it, one must consider the magnification and the relationship between the focal length and the radius of curvature, where the radius of curvature equals 2 times the focal length. In this case, the magnification of 1.5 indicates a specific relationship that needs to be analyzed to find the focal length. The mirror's shape remains constant regardless of the distance from the object, but the image changes. Understanding these principles will help accurately determine the radius of curvature.
Huskies213
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
:confused: Can anyone explain what i am doing wrong?
I thought the radius of curvature is 2 x the distance from mirror..

A mirror produces an image magnified by 1.5 when your face is 29 cm from the mirror. What is the radius of curvature?

I thought it would be .29m x 2 = .58m... but that is wrong.. can anyone help?!?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The radius of curvature of a mirror is a statement about the shape of the mirror. Does a mirror change shape when you move to different distances from it?
 
RE mirrors

no the mirror doesn't change shape when you move distances from it. the image does... *more hints ...im still lost...
 
You need to work out the Radius of Curvature from the magnification.

Also, Radius of Curvature = 2 x the focal length (f) - so if you can figure out f, then you can figure out the radius of curvature quite easily.

Claude.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top