How Do You Calculate the Sum of the Series 1/(k^1.5)?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter homology
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series Summation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the summation of the infinite series 1/(k^1.5), exploring its convergence and potential exact value. Participants delve into mathematical techniques, including the use of the Laplace transform and the Riemann zeta function, while also considering the implications of the series in the context of a puzzle involving geometric shapes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the series converges but struggles to find its exact value, seeking hints from others.
  • Another participant claims to have approximated the sum to about 2.61216453017413 by adding a large number of terms.
  • A different participant attempts to express the series using the Laplace transform, leading to an integral that they find challenging to evaluate.
  • One participant suggests that the series is related to the zeta function, specifically \(\zeta(3/2)\), but questions the existence of a simpler expression for it.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism about finding a closed-form expression for the zeta function at fractional powers, indicating that such expressions are generally difficult to obtain.
  • A participant shares that the series is part of a puzzle involving geometric shapes, which influences their expectation for a neater solution.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the exact value of the series and the feasibility of finding a closed-form expression. There is no consensus on the existence of a simpler representation for the zeta function at fractional powers, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact evaluation of the series.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the Riemann zeta function and its evaluation at integer and fractional values, highlighting the complexity of deriving closed-form expressions for non-integer arguments. The discussion includes assumptions about convergence and the nature of the series without definitive resolutions.

homology
Messages
305
Reaction score
1
hello,

I'm working on a little puzzle and part of it requires summing the infinite series 1/(k^1.5) which clearly converges, but I've never been very good at actually finding what a series converges to. Could you give me a good swift kick in the head. Just a hint will do.

Thanks,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
does it converge to something like 2.61216453017413...? that's what i got by adding the first 90 million terms.
 
Yeah I know, but how to show to what it converges exactly?
 
Here's something I've been trying. bear with me

Now

[itex] \frac{1}{(k^{1.5})}[/itex]

is the laplace transform of

[itex] \sqrt{t} \frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi}}[/itex]

So we can rewrite our series as

[itex] \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k^{1.5}} = \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi}} \int_{0}^{\infty} \sqrt{t} e^{-kt} dt[/itex]

The integral is pretty nice being positive and decreasing so there's probably a nice theorem out there saying we can swap sum and integral, which gives us

[itex] \frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi}} \int_{0}^{\infty} \sqrt{t} \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} e^{-kt} dt[/itex]

The sum is a geometric one, or pretty close, and we get the following

[itex] \frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi}} \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{\sqrt{t}e^{-t}}{1-e^{-t}} dt[/itex]

Now I'm a big baby and can't figure out how to integrate this. I shove it in mathematica (and replace infinity with a big number) and I get the same (approximately) as I do when evaluate the truncated series. Which is about 2.61238. Now I'm sure there's a nice way to evaluate this integral and get an exact answer. Any takers?
 
Last edited:
murshid_islam said:
does it converge to something like 2.61216453017413...? that's what i got by adding the first 90 million terms.

Well, you have the first two decimal places correct. It's 2.6123753486854883433485675679240716305708006524...

It's just the zeta function, which is easy to calculate.
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/RiemannZetaFunction.html
 
Well I looked into the link and I can see lots of information on the zeta function evaluated at integer values but nothing about fractional powers like 3/2. Could you outline how to get an exact expression for something like this?

Thanks

Kevin
 
homology said:
Well I looked into the link and I can see lots of information on the zeta function evaluated at integer values but nothing about fractional powers like 3/2. Could you outline how to get an exact expression for something like this?

Thanks

Kevin

it converges to [itex]\zeta (\frac{3}{2})[/itex]. What makes you think there's a nicer way to write it down? :smile:
 
homology said:
Well I looked into the link and I can see lots of information on the zeta function evaluated at integer values but nothing about fractional powers like 3/2. Could you outline how to get an exact expression for something like this?

There are several mentions of fractional values, just none for 3/2. I doubt there's a closed form expression; finding closed-form expressions for zeta values other than even integers is hard in general.
 
I only thought it converged to a nicer expression because its part of a puzzle I was working on. You are given a gift that is unusually wrapped. It is shaped like a stack of cubes, the first one is 1 foot height the second is [itex] \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}[/itex]
The third is
[itex] \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}[/itex]
and so on. So the height is clearly infinite. The problem also asks about the surface area, which is infinites and the volume which gives us the series I started with, which is finite. Given that it was a puzzle, I sort of supposed that it would come out nicer. Thanks for all the input.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K