How Do You Calculate the Time Constant of an RL Circuit?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the time constant of an RL circuit that reaches 85% of its final value in 1.86 seconds, use the formula τ = R/L, where τ is the time constant. The current I(t) can be expressed as I(t) = (ε₀/R)(1 - exp(-t/τ)). Since 85% completion corresponds to 15% remaining, take the natural log of 0.15, which gives approximately 1.897 time constants needed. Dividing 1.86 seconds by 1.897 results in about 0.980 seconds per time constant. This value is close to 1, indicating a typical expected answer for time constants in such circuits.
pmontone
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Can anyone tell me what formula I would use to find the time constant for a circuit that reaches 85% of its final value 1.86 seconds after the switch is closed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am assuming that this circuit is in series with a constant voltage source, and initially there is no current when the switch is first thrown, for which case we have the first order ode arrising from taking Kirchhoff's voltage law around the loop.
\dot{I}+\frac{R}{L} I-\frac{\varepsilon_{0}}{R} = 0 , I(0) = 0 \cr<br /> I(t) = \frac{\varepsilon_{0}}{R} \left( 1- \exp(-t \tau) \right) , \tau = R/L
where tau is the time constant you seek. Now use the information given, by taking the ratio @ t=0, and solve. Hope this helps, sincerely, x.
 
85% completion means 15% incomplete.

take the natural log of .15 (the decimal form of 15%). This is -1.897. toss out the negative as this is what you get when working with logs of numbers less than 1. what you are left with is 1.897. This is the number of time constants needed to reach 85% of completion.

divide you 1.86 seconds by 1.897, and you get about 0.980 seconds per time constant.

This is awfully close to 1, which might be the round answer you are expected to get. use this formula to plot 1,2,3,4,and 5 time constants, and you'll begin to see the pattern:

1-e-tc#.

that is: one minus (eulers number raised to the negative tc#). You'll get approximately .63, .87, .95, .98 and .99. But do it for yourself, with and without the "one minus"
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top